[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Extra juicy! | Home]

Did I get fucked?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 34
Thread images: 15

File: crystaldiskmark.jpg (71KB, 416x379px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
crystaldiskmark.jpg
71KB, 416x379px
Did I get fucked?
>>
Sandisk SSD Plus 240GB btw
>>
>>51599999
checked
>>
>>51599999
>>
File: Crucial MX100 Test.jpg (80KB, 425x384px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Crucial MX100 Test.jpg
80KB, 425x384px
>>51599999

Try the test again at these settings so I can compare. This screenshot is over a year old though.
>>
>>51600091
Results are indistinguishable from the first test.
>>
>>51600178
>>51600012
You got what you paid for.
>>
>>51599999
they are fine providing you are on a sata2 controller

ps nice quints nigga!
>>
>>51599999
Nice quints.

Your bottleneck is probably your mobo now.
>>
>>51600304
This makes sense, using a P5Q-E from years ago. Thank you friend.
>>
>>51600342
yeah that is a sata 2 (3gbps) controller so you are getting as fast as you can get. sata 3 (6gbps) would get you ~double those speeds but you aint really gonna notice the difference in the real world
>>
>>51600012
Should have gotte a 840 evo
>>
>>51599999
If you are using SATA2 no, its bottlenecked.
If you are using SATA3 you did got fucked.
>>
>>51600091
This is what I get on my sandisk 240gb. OP got fucked over
>>
Bought the same thing for my craptop.
Laptop is using SATA2.
Similar results.
>>
File: HDD benchmark.jpg (44KB, 396x319px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
HDD benchmark.jpg
44KB, 396x319px
>>51599999
>>51600012
I got a Sandisk Ultra II 480 GB SSD and it performs a bit better than that on the 4k read and write but similarly on the sequential read/write. It's currently plugged into a SATA II port. Pic related is how my old hard drive performed. Also, checked.
>>
>>51600091
>Crucial MX100
>>
File: shmnda.png (105KB, 804x740px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
shmnda.png
105KB, 804x740px
>>51599999
1tb ssd lyfe
>>
File: optima.png (18KB, 406x364px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
optima.png
18KB, 406x364px
You're kinda low.
My Optima on SATA2.
>>
File: evo.png (31KB, 385x318px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
evo.png
31KB, 385x318px
>>51600091
Man, I thought the 850 evo was supposed to be faster. At least it's faster than my old Agility 3 though.
>>
>>
File: CDM.png (51KB, 410x382px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
CDM.png
51KB, 410x382px
>>51604779
>>51605364
Why post these if you do not report the SSD name? Boasting?
>>
>>51605498
Not them but.
Now i see what was that text space for now.
>>
>>51605498

Its probably the 950 PRO.

Literally the MEME ssd
>>
>>51600012
Fuck I just bought the 120GB version

Am I fucked?
>>
File: 1tb.png (847KB, 2272x820px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1tb.png
847KB, 2272x820px
>>51605498
>>
File: 840.png (37KB, 416x379px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
840.png
37KB, 416x379px
>>51599999
r8 me f.am
>>
>>51599999
The "SSD Plus" is their barebones "it's better than a HDD" version. That's what their specs say online, you should have read before buying.

The "ultra II" is the more performant one.
>>
>>51604779
That's faster than SATA3 speeds. I suspect you're using one of those terrible cache accelerators.
>>
Intel SSDSC2CT240A4 240GB
>>
>>51599999
the only number that really matters is the 4k read really, everything else you won't even notice for anything except benchmarking
>>
File: Untitled-1.jpg (83KB, 402x367px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Untitled-1.jpg
83KB, 402x367px
>>
>>51607669
You work FAST, nigga!

That's nearly as quick as one stick of DDR2 800.
>>
File: diskmark.png (38KB, 422x378px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
diskmark.png
38KB, 422x378px
I have no idea whether this is good or bad.

>>51605498
EVO>PRO Confirmed

Also, nice digits OP
Thread posts: 34
Thread images: 15


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.