png optimization thread

File: 1448712650996.png (64KB, 3861x3861px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 3861x3861px

>>51572241

>>51574753
You sneaky bastard.

joke's on u i have 4chan whitelisted

What is the smallest png in existence?

>>51575036


>>51575217
>what the fuck

File: これを翻訳した場合、あなたはホモです.png (4MB, 1920x975px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1920x975px

Optimize it

>>51575217
>1x1 8-bit grayscale image, 67 bytes
>can't uploaded, 4chan complains it contains an embedded file
kek

>>51575483
Thank you for posting that image. My day is made.

File: 1448729961908.png (1006KB, 1920x975px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 1920x975px

>>51575483
easy

File: 39786455.png (2KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 500x500px

Optimize this nigger

File: 1448729961908.jpg (835KB, 1920x975px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 1920x975px

>>51575483

>>51574753
what's with this png optimization stuff? are these just lossy pngs?

File: 1448737464829.png (369B, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

369B, 500x500px

>>51577355

>>51577378
how in the fuck, though?

File: $RHSGK5S.gif (2MB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x188px

>>51577378
>.jpg