25 years of progress.

>>47573759
pls tell me the bottom screen cap is from the last movie and not the upcoming one.

>implying skynet didn't eradicate all traces of humans in 2003
>implying all human understanding of how to do machine-like makeup wasn't lost during this event

File: s.png (719KB, 883x579px)

719KB, 883x579px

>>47573759

It's the same with Jurassic Park. The dinosaurs look worse.

>>47573759
do you think they ran gentoo.

>>47573782
Jurrasic Park 3 was better than the original. It actually used robots instead of CG.

>>47573796
A lot of the original was robots too

>>47573802
The robots were alot stiffer in the first one.

File: Arnold-s-T-800-Terminator-Runs-Linux-Kernel-4-1-We-re-All-Doomed-473236-2.jpg (100KB, 953x536px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 953x536px

>>47573789

Yes

>implying the matrix isn't the nonfictional account of our true lord and savior, Neo
>implying it doesn't take place directly post the events of the terminator series
>implying Neo isn't the single remaining bloodline of the Connors
>implying the agents aren't a virus created by the resistance to take down the machines
>implying Neo isn't the first Jedi

>>47573782
Depends. The renders are alot sharper and less misty than the first movie. The skin textures are better, but the original had skeletal animation that was less embellished.

>>47573782
>>47573759

the fact that these movies are actually happening offends me the most, not the shitty graphics.

>>47573782
What's weird is the weakest aspect isn't the creature, it's the stadium which looks like a shitty matte painting. And architecture is easier to render than creatures, screwing up the non animated parts is silly.

>>47573826
>yfw John Connor changed the USE flags from kill to protect

>>47573759
>proper makeup team
>vs
>cheap as fuck digital artistry that most plebs won't notice anyway and can be partially covered up with large amounts of motion blur and makes the producers more shekels in the end

gee.....you're surprised why?

File: ffs.jpg (182KB, 1275x528px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1275x528px

>>47573863
This seems to be a recurring problem in modern movies, see the background in this bit from the new star wars trailer for instance

>>47573815
The stiff robotics in the first Jurassic Park prevented them from exaggerating the movement of the CGI too much. In Jurassic Park 3 the robotics movement were improved drastically so there was far less contraints on the corresponding cgi animation of the dinosaurs, so even though the render quality is much higher in JP3 to point where the lighting and textures matches more closely between animatronic and cgi, it's all for nothing since the movements looks like a fantasy movie.

>>47573759
Seeing this makes me appreciate the practical special FX masters of old even more.

/g/ - Television and Film

File: 600full-godzilla-vs.-destoroyah-screenshot.jpg (202KB, 520x720px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 520x720px

>>47573782
Why can't they make CGI look as good as Godzilla's costume in
Godzilla v.s Destroyah?

Seriously most movies i've seen with CGI being used for giant monsters suck ass. King Kong was an exception I suppose.

>>47573897
jesus, those walls look terrible. And the cloth too.

The daffyduck troopers look horrible, but that's a design choice rather than just failed 3d lighting/texturing like all that architecture.

>>47574013
I'm not sure why movie CG looks so bad in general for the technology available nowadays

We're capable of better graphics rendering in real-time on a consumer machine than the crap they showed on that terminator trailer

>>47574013
Because americans will laugh at the suits and it won't make money
Also aren't we getting a new toho big G movie? I wonder how good the suit will look.

File: JW1.jpg (576KB, 1397x702px) Image search: [Google]

576KB, 1397x702px

>>47573782
Don't worry, it will get better

>>47574013
That Heisei era wasn't that good an example and he could barely move which is why the fights are mostly two monsters on opposite sides of the screen shooting beams at each other. And increasing the creature size made the models look like shit.

>>47574030
The mountains/artillery look specially bad to me

File: JW2.jpg (569KB, 1395x697px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 1395x697px

>>47574062
Can't wait to see how blue everything will be

>>47574062
>entrance to park probably cost a fortune
>live dinosaur in front of you
>watch the show from the phone screen so you don't mess the recording

at least the humans are very realistic

>>47574062
Where are the shadows cast by the pavilion roofs?

>>47574086
It is cloudy, the light is pretty diffuse. Probably the sun is blocked by a cloud.

File: 1427745453492.png (759KB, 938x470px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 938x470px

>>47573782

>>47574063
I enjoyed the beam spam and the slow walk of destruction. That new Godzilla movie was pure shit. That dubstep soundtrack, that shitty cgi, the shitty actors. I don't get why people like that breaking bad guy so much. He just doesn't work in a Godzilla movie. The other 2 main characters in the new movie were laughable at best. Godzilla movies are meant to be fun and entertaining. The new movie lacked all of that and was filled instead with lovey dovey drama bs.

File: mfWw.jpg (29KB, 637x475px)

29KB, 637x475px

>>47574006
>going to /tv/ for tv and film discussion
It's like you want cancer poured into your eyes

>>47573833
So that would put the entire Star Wars universe inside the matrix?

Neo is just a regular guy when he's not in the simulated world.

File: 1427744342047.jpg (707KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 1920x1080px

>>47574080

>>47574176
They have some quality content, sometimes
see
>>47574143
quite kekworthy

[spoiler]I started going there for the Chloe Threads[/spoiler]

>>47574143
>wtc in background

i lold

>>47574189
15/10 would watch in IMAX 3d for $30 a ticket

>>47573782
>>47573759

>Being autistic enough to not realize the CGI in trailers is a work in progress.

>>47574162
> That new Godzilla movie was pure shit.
Here's the problem they couldn't make up they're mind on what kind of Godzilla movie they wanted to make, either the somber tone of the original or the monster mash of a versus, they tried to put both and they ended up with neither.

>>47574189
JJurassic Abramspark

>>47573863
>>47573897
>critiquing a trailer about the compositing
The compositing work in trailers is ALWAYS shit. A-L-W-A-Y-S. They need to produce the scenes that won't be ready until months down the line right at that time. Of course it's going to look awful.

Wait for the movie to come out and THEN critique the awful compositing. Once they have months to work and render it, then they won't have any excuses for the shit work they do (ie The Hobbit).

>>47574201
>spoiler on technology board

What are we gonna spoil, patch notes

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    >not knowing how to do spoilers on /g/

>>47574264
we tv now, keep up

>>47574006
>/g/ - Television and Film

>>47574201
Nice spoiler, retard.

>>47574235
guardians of the galaxies first trailer looked like shit

movie was purty gud

>>47574235
You're talking to the same retards who were freaking out when the windows 10 tech preview was released.

File: CrippleTackleFull.webm (1MB, 960x520px)

1MB, 960x520px

>>47574303

would have been better if the Marvel Cinematic Universe wasn't a thing; James Gunn wasn't allowed to go full James Gunn like pic

>>47574143
10/10

>>47574179
>implying there was even a real world in the movies

Who has the WEBM of that cloth scene in Hobbit?

>>47575602
Which scene?