so high definition

>>47517283
Thought the screen would be a shitty gimmick, but it's pretty comfy and doesn't kill the battery somehow. I'm still not used to the buttons 5 months on though.

>>47517283
Damn bro, that plain text must be as crisp as ever. Great investment op
>retard

>>47517283
>I'm still not used to the buttons 5 months on though
>ever buying a phone with the fucking physical buttons on the back of the phone.

The only reason LG even sells phones is because of the few sperglord autists that hate samsung for X retarded reason.

I'm sorry for your loss

Not an expert on phone screens but this one looks nice. Colours look really good, a bit artificial but good.

File: 1331139648851.gif (3MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 200x150px

>>47517378
>X retarded reason
Removable battery and SD slots are now retarded features? Ok.

>>47517283
wow you just bought the G3 when the G4 is expected to be released next month

>>47517283
Power + Volume buttons at back
>Master fucking race
You have no idea how much better it actually is until you own a G3

Been considering getting this phone. How much can battery last at its best?
I'm not an extreme user, I don't play video games, I don't watch videos that much, so I'm a pretty light user. Can it last at least one whole day?

>1440p
>on a 5" display
What's the point? It's going to look the same as a 1080p or amoled 720 anyways.
>but muh microscope
You have to squint to see the difference.

>>47518347
Yes, with data on and not too heavy usage it can last probably a day and a half at best

>>47518347
i can goto sleep by accident watching a 1080p twitch stream wake up several hours later with maybe 20 percent battery left

Ie. Last night went to sleep watching a stream at 9 woke up at 4 with like 16 percent battery

>>47518347
battery life is good, however a lot of things were sacraficed in the display for that PPI


http://www.anandtech.com/show/8169/the-lg-g3-review/2

>In the maximum brightness department, LG noticeably struggles here. While the G2 had around 410 nits peak luminance, the G3 regresses to around 390 nits maximum. I didn’t find any outdoor brightness boost function in this case either. This means that outdoors, the display will be worse than 1080p devices like the One (M8) and Galaxy S5. The other issue is contrast, which is around 900:1. This isn’t actually as bad as most have made it out to be. The big issue with contrast here is how it degrades with viewing angles. In most angles, a black test image will rapidly wash out towards white when viewing the display at oblique angles.


cont

>>47517478
>>47517378
Whut? You guys must have grown up during the summers when Touchwiz sucked a big ass turd.

>>47518377
There is one point. The neckbeards that are so nearsighted they can hold it up to their nose and enjoy the HD image.

File: 64549.png (30KB, 600x475px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x475px

>>47518447
>Saturations are where LG has gone a bridge too far. While some may enjoy “vivid” color, the saturation compression is insane here. In many cases, 80% and 100% saturations are effectively identical. This can be seen on the red and green sweeps. 60% saturation is often closer to the 80% saturation target. LG really, really needs to either stop doing this or give an option to disable it. This is simply just immensely detrimental to the viewing experience, especially in any situation where color accuracy is actually necessary. Editing photos is effectively impossible on this display because the results will look completely different on most other displays that are closer to following sRGB color standards.


There are better phones with that display resolution out now, LG rushed to get it to market and had to pay the price in quality.

>>47517478
Implying the g3 doesn't compete with the Note

>>47517283
Feels comfy, doesn't it?

>>47517283
>double clock

>>47518476
That's pretty funny that the 5c rates higher than the 5s, and by a pretty large margin too.

Didn't expect the N5 all the way up there considering all the corners Google/LG cut with it, but objectively looking at mine, it does have a very nice screen.

Still, all those DeltaE numbers are pretty mediocre. If a desktop display came out with a DeltaE (calibrated) at 1.8, every review site ever would consider it mediocre, bordering on poor. Most decent screens these days that are factory calibrated come out at <3 already. (And hardware calibrating it yourself usually results in less than <1, mine for instance is at 0.4)

Manufacturers really need to stop oversaturating these displays, or at the very least make it easier to calibrate it ourselves.

>>47517478
I work for a place that repairs smartphones and I can testify. Samsung smartphones are shit.

File: 1401460219593.jpg (155KB, 703x551px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 703x551px

>>47517283
>quad hd on a phone with neither the size nor brightness to back it up

>>47519289
I also own the G3. It's very mediocre. A solid 5/10. My Z1S was lightyears ahead of this thing.

>>47519289
I work for the Emperor of Mobile Electronics as his Grand Vizier.

You're full of shit.

>>47519339
Lol, whatever kid.

>>47519227
I dunno man, I've met plenty of people who like saturated colours, or say they cant tell the difference.

I agree that calibration should be easier though.

>>47519289
Can back this guy up, S2s and S3s are the biggest pieces of shit, and HTC EVO LTE

>>47519496
HTCs are usually average. I don't get alot of repairs for them. But, holy mother of fuckness... The S3... The bain of my existence. I have between 10 and 25 people A FUCKING WEEK who have broken charging ports on them. They are the WORST smartphone manufacturers as of 4-14-2015.

>>47519641
>40 million galaxy s3's sold
>wonders why he has to fix a dozen of them a week

Nigga are you stupid or what?

You're like a god damn mechanic complaining he has to fix cars

>>47519922
No shit, fuckwit. But I live in a town of less than 10,000 people. You do the math on the failure rate. Also, I wasn't complaining, I was answering a question. Read the whole fucking thread before you open your stupid fucking mouth.

>>47520128
>You do the math
How about you fuckin do it, you dumb shit. You're twisting facts to suit your subjective bias.

File: image.jpg (51KB, 1024x756px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1024x756px

>>47517283
>tfw not giving in to the placebo on my M9

>>47520196
Go eat a dick, faggot.

>>47517283
>brand new LG G3
You fucked up.

>>47520206
Yeah you only have to put up with a shit camera, overheating SoC,and fuckhuge bezels.
PS the 1440p display in the S6 is more power efficient than other 1080p displays.

>>47517359
Tasker or Gravity Screen

>>47519334
Ouch 5/10 really? So far this is the best Android phone I've used, haven't touched anything newer though.

The screen could definitely be brighter. I have issues seeing things outdoors. I live in the desert though and it's rather sunny here.

>>47518412
With moderate usage I get around 2 days, sometimes 3

Nexus 6 owner since launch, love the screen too.
As someone who works at a phone shop, I'd 100000% recommend anyone in the UK to buy a G3. By far the best value phone right now.

>>47523241
I uh, I'm not sure I follow.

You're saying you had a nexus 6 and dumped it for a g3 and love it?

Nexus 6 > G2 > G3

>>47517283
>Calls its marketing quad HD

To confuse the average dumb consumers on the 4k hype
Just say 1440p anon.

>>47520206
that's a really good looking phone