What would be considered essential iron-pill or swole-core literature?

>>31966
Rosenberg esp. the myth of the 20th century

<3 /pol/

File: 1489510580967.jpg (8KB, 250x295px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x295px

>>31966
Mishima

>almost won a nobel prize in lit, wrote tons of top-tier novels
>aesthetic as fuck
>committed seppuku after a failed coup attempt

>>31966
Junger, Evola, Yockney

>>33935
Beat me to it.

File: embrace.png (57KB, 500x382px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x382px

>>33941
great minds and such...

>>33923
Which one of his books is considered best?
I'd like to start with that one.

>>33956
i would suggest The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea

his best stuff is his final 4 works, together called The Sea of Fertility, but committing to 1000+ pages might be a bit much at first

>>31966
Julius Evola.
Jack Donovan.

The most inportant readings to orient onesself in the world:

Thus Spoke Zarathustra, prolouge part 5: the last man.

Might is Right, iconoclastic and spinning of the web

The Way of Men, entire book

Ride the Tiger, european nihilism through dissolution of european nihilism

"Genetic similarity theory, ethnocentrism, and group selection", entire paper

These are short easy passages, and there are significant errors in all of these works and in all of these authors worldviews. However, these passages are vital

>>31966
Dumb frogposter.

Homer
Sophocles
Milton
Melville
Burton
Bible
Aquinas
Arrian
Frazier
Browning
Stendahl
Yeats
Plutarch
Schopenhauer
Spinoza
Octavio Paz
Omar Khayyam
Marlowe
William Dunbar
And so on and so forth