Are big legs aesthetic for a man?
>>42844184
lol, no
>>42844184
Aesthetic legs are aesthetic..
Stop using this word wrong
>>42844184
Proportionate, not looking bulkier than the upper body, strong and toned but not huge
A man should look like an Y imho
>>42844184
if your goal is to attract other men, yes
otherwise your proportions should look something like this
>>42844261
>proportions should look like a Ching Chong chinaman
Mike Chang pls go
>>42844188
>>42844229
>>42844256
>>42844261
T. dyels
My wife rubs my legs (and especially glutes) all the time, almost as frequently as she fondles my abs, arms, and chest. HUGE legs aren't as important as them just not looking like twigs, I'll agree, but if you can genetically get big legs naturally with standard exercise, fucking do it.
yes they are. for the longest time the only leg related exercise I did was jogging and I was totally legless. Now people who don't train calves sadden me.
>>42844319
i don't care what your ugly wife does, my man.
>>42844184
You want to look like a V not an X
Yes they are. But, as with everything, it is about balance. Huge legs without a developed upper body look ridiculous.
nope
>>42844367
So you should not have any legs?
>>42844604
you should have legs but not at the level of fucking Robert Förstemann
>>42844608
So where are the legs in V?
>>42844184
desu a little leaner than your pic is preferable for attraction purposes op
>>42844601
this. if you don't have big calves don't let your legs get too big. you will look fucked up. zyzz had good proportion
>tfw llok like an x
>>42844184
Yes as long as they are proportional to your physique
>>42844635
>>42844614
>>42844367
This is a V or Y
>>42844353
Only if you have the glutes to back them up. And calves.
>>42844353
haha
>>42844353
>>42845558
>>42846109
>ITT. dyel virgins attempt to ridicule man with state registered bloodsucker
All of you lose.
Calves are better than quads?