How achievable is Reg Park mode naturally?

>>42751850
On camera, assuming average height with average genetics, you'll achieve that kind of mass natty eventually considering lacking legs and pretty normal sized arms, but you'll never have his ribcage size, ab genetics and chest shape.

>>42751850
Reg Park didn't even achieve that look naturally anon.

>>42751850
steve reeves was roid guinea pig. all after who resemble are imitators

>>42753030
"no"

File: 517f5f2ca289fe15a0160002d18185c5.jpg (24KB, 237x486px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 237x486px

People claim that Reg Park is natural because he competed in the era before steroids. But that's misleading because if you actually look at pictures from that era he is much smaller.

Most of the famous pictures of him looking huge are from the steroid era

>>42751850
It's not.

>>42753030
lol no that's literally more muscle mass than what is naturally possible

>>42754164

the 50s were definitely not pre-steroids either

>>42754188
Idk I feel like I'm pretty close at only 21. Consistent lifting and dieting should get me there. Obviously not with the same body structure but still

>>42755948
>pretty close
Post pic so we can all laugh like we did at the kid who thought he looked like zyzz