Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Fitness e-celeb Natties 2017-09-04 11:29:38 Post No. 42748992
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Fitness e-celeb Natties 2017-09-04 11:29:38 Post No. 42748992
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 09679c4c2e6c1389c644ce8b534a3de1.jpg (117KB, 412x577px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 412x577px
How many of these so called "fake natties" are actually natty?
I mean from all of them, people who get called out for being fake natties like connor murphy, jeff seid (and all the other "aesthetics" bodybuilders), surely one of them might actually be natty?
I mean there are so many people around. They could just literally be a genetic freak and their natural limits could be way higher than what's stated by FFMI studies.
I mean imagine if you were that kid who was born with a myostatin deficiency, stayed natty, but got as big as a roiding bodybuilder, there would be no way to prove you were natty.
>>
100% of people who "claim" natty are unnatty. One of the purest tenants of nattyhood is not feeling the overwhelming need to point out that you're natty. The only time a natty person should ever even bring up roids is if someone point blank says "hey are you on steroids" and his only answer should be "no."
>>
>>42749036
Doesn't really make sense. If you're natty you still have a very low limit compared to roiders.
I'm dyel so this doesn't apply to me, but it's not farfetched to say that a natty might use his nattyness as a reason for not getting bigger.
And it gets weird for someone to stay in that range of just above natty limit, because people will accuse u of roids and other people will wonder why you aren't getting bigger on roids.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1