Boron Shown to Increase Test Levels

Also worth noting:
>Two rodent studies examining boron’s toxicity have also found significant dose-dependent increases in testosterone levels after boron supplementation, highest dose (500 mg/day) leading to a massive 160% increase.
>Though this amount – not only crazily expensive – would be highly toxic also, since dosages exceeding 25 mg/day start showing symptoms of toxicity and are not recommended.

A few Amazon reviews I've read claim this really works

>>42708974
try it OP and report back in a few weeks.

if it's not increasing test levels to a supraphysiological level it's to doing anything more than normal fluctuations and if you have clinically low test you need to go to the doctor

>>42709251
When will this shilling that only steroids can make notable test changes stop

>>42708974
>"One study has been conducted on athletic males participating in bodybuilding, using a lower dose. 2.5mg of Boron daily for 9 weeks elevated plasma boron levels (20.1ppb to 32.6ppm; a 62% increase) yet failed to find significant differences between groups for any hormones measured."

I guess it's time for the needle.

>>42709345
when its wrong aka never

slightly higher spikes for a bit until the drug stops being effective will do just about nothing for your gains

File: IMG_1958.png (124KB, 382x491px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 382x491px

>>42709449

>>42709575
there's no proof anywhere that test fluctuations within normal human limits produce superior muscle mass. only clinically low values and supraphysiological levels are proven. the overwhelming amount of evidence can be found in healthy males who make laughable gains compared to steroid users.

File: 1467145570107.png (467KB, 1754x2480px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1754x2480px

>>42708974
>https://examine.com/supplements/boron/
>one study

falls within the realm of irrelevance

http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970?WT.mc_id=SFB_NNEWS_1508_RHBox