frank zane reminding us that you don't need to have a lot of muscle or be on drugs to be aesthetic
>or be on drugs
You were so close
>frank zane
>not alot of muscle
This is how much /fit/ warps your mind.
>or be on drugs to be aesthetic
you do realize his nickname was "the chemist", right?
>>42644509
It's bait, but there are a lot of people on here that think along the same lines. After consuming so much bodybuilding/strongmen media, and having the world's 0.0000001% im stregth/aesthetics/genetics all over youtube, I genuinely can't gauge what your average person would call muscular.
>>42644526
He was a chemistry teacher.
>>42644559
well I'll give you a hint, that's in the upper quartile of what people still find attractive. Beyond that it's just barafags and fetishism.
>>42644479
>or be on drugs
M U S C L E
D Y S M O R P H I A
>>42644479
Zane is the true king of aesthetics
Arnold will always look like a tool beside this beast
>>42644479
do you guys think this physique can be achieved naturally ? hes not that big
>>42644674
I think it's at the upper edge of what the natural limit is for people with good genetics and outstanding diet.
>Literally nicknamed the chemist
Come on man
>>42644674
>>42644733
Jesus you guys are delusional
>frank zane
>not a lot of muscle
oh, you poor little delusional boy
>>42644479
frank zane would have looked WAAY better if he had roided - he has the body of an average guy who lifts for a year
such a waste of potential
>>42644581
no way nigga
he was aminos before it was even a THING
>>42644674
>>42644733
>>42644479
tell me this thread is full of people meta-baiting please
>>42645055
show me one "natty" physique that's better
protip: you can't because you're full of shit
>>42644479
lel frank zane not on drugs. thats why they call him the chemist i guess
>>42645801
they called him the chemist because he knew a lot about biochemistry
he was natty, if you want to get big you'll have to use roids
>>42644674
That physique would take 5-6 years natty or 2 on gear
>>42645769
You stupid or something?
>>42645964
>he was natty, if you want to get big you'll have to use roids
>>42644674
Jeff Nippard does, too bad he only compares Zane to fellow turbo manlets
>>42645978
Lmaoing @ ur face win I am Frank zoingle and nutty liftaer
>Mfw every time you plateau
Zoingle doingled again bitchtaccho
>>42645983
I'll take that as an obvious concession
>>42644733
DYEL detected
>>42646019
jeff ain't natty, son. Next thing you gonna tell me is that buff dudes are natty and connor too baka
>>42646112
poor attempt at a deflection.
>>42644479
He was on lots of gear and being 190 lbs at 5'9" and in contest shape isn't exactly short on muscle.
You guys are idiots, Frank Zane was big back in his day, It's just these hgh injecting fuckers that look like literal monsters.
>>42645978
>That physique would take 5-6 years natty or 2 on gear
do you realize how long frank zane trained fo rthat physique
>>42644479
>Nicknamed 'The Chemist' by his contemporaries
>"not on drugs"
>>42644479
>OP pic
>don't need to have a lot of muscle
What is a lot of muscle to you OP?
>>42644647
>5'9, 180lbs
>beast
Do people seriously believe he is natty or is it bait?
Was Franco natty too?
>>42646091
You fucking retarded faggot, he's saying the same thing as you.
>>42650126
Nobody was natty back then or now.