PHUL

strength=size u redditor

>>42640639
you have to admit that just the compound movements is not enough in this life

you gotta do them accessories

File: 1476831580707.jpg (81KB, 960x958px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 960x958px

>>42640627

Because Layne Norton is an idiot especially when compared to Mike T.

>>42640662
what?

Brandon Campbell is the author of PHUL

>>42640678

My bad, was thinking PHAT. My reasoning stands.

>>42640692
so why do you think phul is bad? what's so bad about it?

>>42640739

It's for people with no real goals, a laundry list of accessories, overlapping movements, and a stupid amount of volume every single day. It looks like someone with ADD made it.

>>42640806
it's right in line with volume recommendations for intermediates looking for general hypertrophy and strength, not everyone is five years into training with a goal of improving their bench 15 pounds by working their off the chest sticking point lmao

Need some routine advice as well, these are my push/pull days, my lats are big enough at the moment but my arms are way behind. Was thinking of replacing pulldowns with another arm exercise, any recommendations?

P
BB Row 5x5
Pulldown 3x12
Cable row 3x12
Face pull 4x20
Hammer curl 4x12
DB curl 4x12

P
Bench 5x5
OHP 5x5
Incl. DB press 3x12
Tri. push down 3x12
SS lat raises 3x15
Tri extensions 3x12
SS lat raises 3x15

>>42640846

It's a stupid amount of volume, and regardless of where you're weak at, everybody except equipped lifters work the full range if motion.