Is this the women's ideal male body?

>>42640450
>toothpick legs
no thanks bruh

I'd say a bit more toned, his muscles aren't that visible, but the proportions of his legs vs torso, arms vs torso, arms vs hands, shoulders and head size. It's pretty good, just cut and tone :^)

>>42640481
Inb4 >toned

>white

Unironically no

File: 1418679695149.jpg (63KB, 388x525px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 388x525px

>>42640588
Online dating statistics state otherwise.

lol at you

File: 1497554122377.jpg (42KB, 480x477px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x477px

>>42640481
>toned

>>42640450
more proof that FRAME is everything

File: 1415648094681.jpg (29KB, 427x426px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 427x426px

>>42640487
>>42640615
not him but when ppl say toned do they not obviously mean defined?? ppl are so pedantic on here

idk, i prefer skellies and skinnyfats to muscular men, but i like traps too and dont know what other women like

>>42641046
Kys

>>42640450
Maybe a bit more leg and chest, but yeah, this is pretty much peak aesthetic.

Roids have only been around since the 40s. Chest training wasn't really popular or easy to do before then either because benches weren't that popular. Why do you think that unattainable bodies would be imprinted into our brain as attractive?

>>42641058
but theyre cute

File: IMG_6480.jpg (67KB, 500x854px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 500x854px

>>42640450
sorry bud. This is perfection

>lifting for women

plebeians

>>42642424
Beats lifting for men faggot.

>>42641046
Kys

File: 1497902642427.gif (39KB, 498x483px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 498x483px

>>42640588
BLACKED donesn't represent real life jamal