Can I be too swoll?

>>42620874
You can if you look like me

he isnt really all that "swole" he is just at really low bodyfat and has bad chest insertions, I will agree it looks bad and unaesthetic to a normie.... Its great progress even if he lost his natty card, but he isnt so far gone he cant go back to normal and up his bf a few % and look better.

>>42620874
>alex jung

>some fat/skinnyfat gook who posts clickbait articles to get hits

Really makes your noggin joggin.

>>42620874
>doesn't know what objective means

Is "objective " abuse the new "literally"?

>>42620923
Basically. Although Baywatch was pretty awful.

>>42620923
>I'm objectively shaking right now

Even if the opinion was exaggerated for clicks of course some people think that its preference. /fit/ gets incredibly triggered about this because it thinks it puts a limiter on how many women they can attract when plenty would not date them for entirely unrelated preferences

>>42620923
never heard it used by anyone irl desu but I get ur point anon

File: WHATTHEFUCUUCKKKCKKC.jpg (31KB, 505x247px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 505x247px

>>42620923
>literally
Fuck i hate this shit

>>42620975
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NCHE1sGy80

>>42620968
I like to say extrapolate a lot. No idea what it means but it really rolls off the tongue in an extrapolated manner

>>42620998
My favourite word to say is imminently. Incredibly imminently is also fun.

File: IMG_0701.jpg (14KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 200x200px

>this is the gook that wrote the article

Glad we have the top fitness experts telling us the state of male stars