The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long
>>42571028
I can't see how that makes sense. Surely more energy if it's twice as bright.
>>42571049
........ hence "half as long"
>>42571028
but dying in a thaisauna because steroid abuse is like throwing a bucket full of shit and vomit over your ohsobright candle.
>>42571049
It burns through its energy faster
Are australian chicks all 2/10's?
>>42571060
No because there is more energy original. If it takes 10 energy 10 minutes to burn out, then 20 energy will take 20 minutes.
>>42571078
No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEciZBKf9zk
>>42571082
kys yourself
>>42571087
proving my point??
>>42571090
A bigger fire will burn longer than a smaller fire. Fucking swear down /fit is full of thick cucks
>>42571082
>>42571108
yeah like you LOL
>>42571108
So you're saying everyone will become a manlet?
>>42571082
>>42571108
Bigger suns also die faster
>>42571982
No they don't lol. If the sun was only 1cm in size them it would burn out of existence quicker than one 100cm in size
>>42571082
Yeah but 10 energy requires much less strength to produce than 20 energy so in reality 20 energy will burn in 40 minutes.
>>42572001
Doest that prove my original point >>42571049
>>42571996
>what is density
>>42572015
No because for example I can hold my breath for 2 minutes but I die if I do it for 4 minutes because I consume much more air energy so it's not linear
>>42572044
Can someone explain it in English because I can not understand how something producing more energy, would lose all that energy quicker, than something that produces less energy in the first place.
>>42571082
american education at it's finest
>>42571082
one for one, baby
>>42572105
You have 2 candles, same height, same width. One has a bigger flame (=brighter). The one with the bigger flame needs more wax for its bigger flame, so it will burn shorter than the one with the smaller flame.