How true is this?

>>42559163

>wanting to fuck sticks incapable of giving birth to children

>be 76 inches

I have transcended your meaningless charts

>>42559163
very true

>>42559178
Shit me too my man. Would be cool to be 77 inches but at this point no one would be able to tell anyway.

>>42559163
not true at all

>>42559163
>I'm a whale at 160 lbs 5'11
Lmao what sort of Anorexic low test DYEL cuck made this?

>>42559163
>6'2"
>95 lbs
>ideal

Fucking what?

>>42559163
>pounds
>inches

i have to use a fuckin calculator you damn retards, learn to use SI damn it

>>42559198
>mens' weight PREFERENCE
meaning mens preference for womenz

>>42559208
THE METRIC SYSTEM!? My car gets 40 rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!

File: 1492807320655.jpg (79KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x683px

>>42559163
Precisely how many threads about penises do you plan on making today?

>>42559163
complete horsecock, let's take 74 inches and 117lbs as an example. That's roughly 6'2" and 53kg. And that's apparently perfect. To me that's grossly underweight

>>42559163
The most successiful pornstars AREN'T Auschwitz survivors, so... pretty much no.
If anything they're all about having as much tits and ass as possible with a flat belly, or at least no pannus if older.

>>42559163
this chart just says "i like my women with the muscular definition of a coma patient"
seriously you're gonna break these underweight bitches' bones if you fuck them

File: same.jpg (78KB, 501x854px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 501x854px

nah

File: lLiPPh0.jpg (46KB, 538x546px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 538x546px

>>42559163
Depends what body type you're after

>>42559211
Oh... Still pretty fucking SKELLY chart, I want something to grab, I want my woman to look like a woman not an anorexic 14 year old boy.

>>42559288
>3: normal
>6: fat
i hope this is bait

File: baby grin.jpg (7KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 184x184px

>>42559178
My man. The charts can't touch us now.

File: dumbass chart.png (280KB, 585x645px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 585x645px

>>42559208
Here, made this because I too find retarded systems to be retarded

>>42559288
Is this some proAna propaganda ?

>>42559359
I see someone here likes fucking whales

>>42559376
stfu you virgin lmfao

>>42559413
xD

>>42559329
43kg at 188cm is "ideal (perfect)". Yeah, this chart is spot on.

If the left axis is in kg and the height remains in inches it seems about right for men

>>42559329
Thanks senpai

>>42559576
>>42559583
OP here. I was just asking if it's right after finding it online. If you think there should be modifications to the cells, please edit it and repost.

>>42559603
Fucking christ that would take some work. The thing is musclemass vs fat can mean two girls at the same height and weight can look pretty damn different. Fat takes up more space than muscles, yet is lighter, so gaining like 2kg of muscle mass and losing 2kg of fat could greatly change a womans physique, and even more noticeably at low bodyfat

File: 1503141869273.jpg (89KB, 538x546px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 538x546px

>>42559288
FTFY

>>42559637
kek'd on 1,2 and 8

Listen. If your bmi is below 16 your mass in general is so low, you WILL look fucking boney and gross. At 20 Bmi myself as a dude, it's slim, but it looks fine. Any BMI between 180-23 can look good based on bodyfat and breast size and such.

If you want a girl with like 15-16 or less BMI you're in the wrong bro. That shit is "could unironically not lift a fire extinguisher if you were passed out from smoke" tier of weak

File: wheredoyouthink.jpg (44KB, 640x477px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 640x477px

>>42559291

>>42560018
Yeah this guys got it right. My girlfriend weighs 500 kg at 1.80meters, about 150 bmi, and I think thats perfect. Anywhere from 23 to 180 bmi is fine in my opinion

File: 1502930974567.jpg (50KB, 320x287px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 320x287px

>>42559163
>75 inches
>185 pounds
and I am still a skelly

Also I went beyond your shitty chart you pathetic autist lmao

>>42560083
This is supposedly a chart of what (anorexic) men think is ideal female height/weight

>>42559163
>>42559163
I think whoever put together this chart goes by what girls say they weigh instead of what girls actually weigh.

>>42560083
You don't read well do you retard?
It's asking what height to weight ratio men like.
>>42559603
The chart is stupid and your weight is a bad indicator.
Do you have a fupa? Cottage cheese thighs? Hit the gym and eat less. Anything else is mostly personal preference.
Ps pls b Minneapolis

>>42560049
>This is the ideal female body. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

>>42559163
>human height in inches
>not in foots
>not using metric system in the first place
are american this retarded?

>>42560117
>You don't read well do you retard?
>It's asking what height to weight ratio men like.
Are you implying there are no men who like other men

fuck off cunt make your charts more clear next time

>>42559603
A very broad rule of thumb is 100 pounds @ 5 foot, plus or minus 10 pounds depending on muscle mass, weight distribution, etc.

So a 5'4" girl's ideal weight is 120, but she'll probably look good anywhere between 110 and 130.

Again that's very general. There are going to be outliers that still look ok and there might be some within that range that still look like shit.

>>42560144
Most don't. A reasonable person would understand who the chart was made for (most of the population). If you want a safe space that doesn't assume you are normal, you might try Tumblr

>>42559329


Thanks m8

190cm
100kg

>Not even on the chart

>>42560211
It's apparantly "mens ideal women bodies"