I'm not gonna make it bros

>>42505755
Less time fishing for compliments on a Mongolian threat singing forum and more time lifting you asshole

Looking better than you did before, keep it up.

>>42505755
RIP chest insertions.

>>42505755
You look better in the before. You could probably cut and lean out a bit more. Don't fall for the bulk natty meme you just get fat and then loss the small amount of muscle you made.

>>42505755
how much did your lifts progress

>>42505772

not looking for compliments, i need advice on what i could be doing wrong if my body still has the same proportions as it had 12kg ago.

>>42505815
Pectus Excavatum is real man..

>>42505831
About 20kg on dumbbell press and 10kg on bicep curls. Legs had huge increase though.


Could it perhaps be that i need to increase my training time from 45 min to 1 hour 30 min in order to burn more energy?

>>42505824
>Don't fall for the bulk natty meme
well thats fucking depressing to hear after all this time..

File: 1499811680175.png (904KB, 1262x713px) Image search: [Google]

904KB, 1262x713px

B A I T
A
I
T

>>42505755
your scale is broken

>>42506084
why would you think this bait.

Im trying to get advice about why i just dont look aesthetic at all

>>42506777
Here's the good part, your shoulders are quite wide.

Your main issue as to why you don't look aesthetic are pectoral insertions, wide waist and hips.

You should aim for a really muscular physique that will take away from your bad proportions. A physique that when people look at you they go "wow that guy is huge." Continue lifting and making progress and then get on the roid train later on. With roids, you should be able to add even more width to your shoulders and lats, which should make you more proportional, but you'll never be "aesthetic."

Either that or go full powerlifter mode.

>>42506909
chezuz man this sounds like this first piece of honest advice I've gotten since i started...

Thank you so much. Its a light in a dark tunnel full of forcefeedings and lifts with few gains. Really thank you

>>42507047
Your arms definitely look bigger and your chest looks a little bigger, so it's not like you haven't made any progress.

How is your training program like? Are you hitting the whole delt well or just the front part? I would recommend doing a lot more lateral and bent over raises to make the delts pop more, as they look a bit flat.

When you do lat exercises, really focus on getting a good squeeze at the end, that way you're making sure that the back is doing most of the work. It's really important that you get a wider back since your waist is so wide.

>>42507100
Noted, i've only recently seen the power of proper pull ups. i'll start targeting those lats, thanks anon

>>42505755
were these pics taken on the same day are you sure your camera isn't busted?

>>42505755

Wokka wokka

File: 20170202_220153.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>42507249
pre

File: 20170814_200128.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>42507249
>>42507320
current.
i know its not much dif. but that means i just got fat. no muscle. no gains

>>42507344
meaning i forcefed myself just for the sake of getting fat and really should just kms

>>42507320
>>42507344
>>42507379

Not sure if b8, but you looking pretty good now op, big difference. Start cutting.

>>42505755
You know you are supposed to be lifting weights while you bulk? You didn't put on anything but fat.

>>42507344
Your arms have grown amazingly well.

obviously there's improvement

you could afford to eat more I think

>>42505755
what are your goals?

>>42507859
>>42507904
I agree with these anons
I started lifting around april, with exception of considerable biceps gain I dont see much difference in anything else (to be honest it might be because I am not trying to lose weight, just gain strength)

>>42505755
Train Fuckin harder man. You're not activating enough of your muscle fibers

>>42507344
start training your back, jesus christ.

cut and you will look good.