Is he right bros? Is cutting and bulking bullshit?

>>42495373
Yes. The only way to lose weight is training the fat areas. Ex. Crunched for belly fat. The only way to build muscle is to go to the gym and use the machines.

>>42495373
pretty much yeah

>>42495373
yes.

>>42495414
Each machine cost the gym approximately $5000. a barbell and bench? Cost peanuts kid. That's why the gym have taken to the internet to try and convince normies to use free weights. Don't fall for their antics.

File: 1427296704352.jpg (181KB, 801x713px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 801x713px

>>42495373
>Gaining weight is bullshit
>Losing weight is bullshit

>hear about athlean in a /fit/ thread a long time ago
>skeptical cynic, figure he's a shill or broscientist or both

>watch a bunch of his videos over a period of months
>realize he's the most legit guy on youtube with 100% true advice all the time

literally nothing bad to say about athlean he's the GOAT. probably the only negative is some of the lifts he suggests look kinda goofy in a gym setting if you're not full DGAF and get embarrassed still

>>42495414
calm down Jason Blaha, you can still bulk and "cut" if you want to

Bulker cutters really get triggered by Athlean? lmfao

>>42495470
>being this fucking dumb

>>42495470
you don't understand the concept of bulking and cutting do you newfriend?

>>42495373
Jeff's titles are a bit misleading/clickbait sometimes, but his videos are full of solid advice. Also, he has the body to back up everything he says, so yeah I trust him.

>>42495373
Can be, factors depend on you, how advanced you are and if you're roiding, last two should go together.

>>42495470
dipshit

>>42495547

he's a legit MSPT and gives the anatomy/physiology-backed advice for every video using his own body as an anatomy chart. nobody else on youtube can do that

>>42495373
yes, he is right about that. but he is not infallible, for example his video on IF is total BS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmZYKtrM5CY

>>42495505
>>42495530
>>42495574
What is wrong about what he said?

>>42495579

Seba Kot aka the Facelees from Poland (he has doctor degree in human anatomy), Austin Barakai and Jordan from Barbell Medicnie

>>42495747

he's obviously not the only guy on youtube with a degree to back his shit up. he's the only one who uses his own body as an anatomy chart for every video tho

Never really payed attention to the guy. What does he say about bulk and cut?

>>42495774

hes actually right, but folks dont get that hes strenght coach and works with real athlethes not some normies wanting to get shredded

real athlethe dont bulk or cut, they just get strong and if they need to be faster, they focus more on things that make them faster, yes they happen to lose weight but not for muscle to show but beacuse they need it for their sport

>>42495774

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fv5xEYhvj4Q

here's the vid

>>42495597
>says that IF isn't a sustainable way to eat. I've been doing 23:1 6 days a week for years now. Super easy. Builds muscle if you do it right.

>>42495838

another guy that doesnt understand that hes strenght/athlethe not physique coach

for physique you can do your IF whenever you like

for athlethe it sucks

>>42495373
No. He's just a meme who make controversial videos to gain money. That's how he got to 2m subscribers.

>>42495804
>real athlethe dont bulk or cut,
Factually incorrect, literally water cutting was perfected by fighters and boxers to be precise even sooner than bodybuilders.
Also why do you care about what athletes do I know athletes that eat fucking pizza day in day out and they still perform well, you are not a freak of nature you are a normal average guy.

Now moving on the video, 1 the pic he post of the guy transforming in 90 days on same body weight is bullshit unless that athleanx has dbol, tren and gh as part of their diet.

Secondly the aim of bulk and cut is it's difficult to gain muscle on maintenance as muscle building is an anabolic process thus a calorific surplus is required to facilitate this better.

>>42495470
>t. nigger

>>42495733
Nothing. Those guys are just dumb

File: Screenshot_169.jpg (158KB, 686x461px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 686x461px

>>42495838
>>42495849

>>42495905
>anabolic process thus a calorific surplus is required to facilitate this better
>what is sourcing

>>42496092
muscle building =/= athletic training

>>42495924
No, that yard thought cutting and bulking simply meant gaining and losing weight, when it really means gaining muscle and fat and losing fat and a little muscle. Leangains are the best way to go imho

>>42496484
>What is growth signalling and hormone production

eating in a surplus to gain muscle is not a meme

eating in a deficit to lose weight is not a meme

>>42496104
What is Google you monkey

BULKING AND CUTTING is great for bodybuilders who alternate drug cycles , not for regular people just trying to look good

>>42495373
Jeff is the most legit guy on youtube, once you get past his clickbait titles.

He gives absolute world class solid advice on pretty much every subject, without bullshit

>>42496720
So what should a 110 lbs twink do ? Please don't say something stupid like leangains since you still gain bfat unless on roids

>>42495905
>water cutting
>boxers
But the intent of that is to just fake-out some pounds so you're lean enough for the weight-in, they don't actually "cut" for extended periods of time, because that shit has ZERO (0) practical use.

>>42496765
bulk

>>42495373
YES. People become fat by overeating. You don't need to eat above your TDEE to gain muscle.

It's like filling a pot hole. If you fill it too much, it's gonna be a bump. Fill it too little and the hole is still there..

Learn to listen to your body. Don't let your mind trick you into eating shit you don't need.

>>42495733
>>42495924
bulking and cutting is a body recomposition concept , not just "hurrrr gaining and losing weight" you fucking troglodytes

File: 1494867889130.png (48KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 657x527px

>>42497032
>you don't need to eat above your TDEE to gain muscle

>>42496928
What do you do when you want to lower your body fat after you bulked to a decent human male weight?

>>42497230
Cut.

>>42496092
>.049 vs .059

aka no real difference. just a statistical one.