What does /fit/ think of my workout?

>>42350789
looks pretty fucking shit
what are your goals?
why arent you training legs?
why are you doing shit 250 crunches instead of incorporating weighted ab work with lower rep ranges?
why is your compound lift 3 sets but most of the other accessory work is 5 sets?

other then that its not too bad

>>42350866
So it looks good for the most part?

>>42350789
It's shit. Tons of random stuff several times a week without any clear goal.

>>42350789
Just pick one of the tried and proven beginner routines rather than just putting together random shit without any understanding of programming or lifting to begin with.

>>42351167
It's a full body workout. Nothing is missed. I get nearly all of my muscles hit in 2-3 hours twice a week.

Good luck deadlifting 3 times a week. Good luck doing that many sets 3 times a week. TERRIBLE, just TERRIBLE.

>>42351299
Won't my muscles get big as fuck? More = better?

>>42351316
>Deadlifting 9 heavy sets a week
>Not snapping your shit up

Pick one

>>42351316
No. More is not always better, especially as a beginner. Less is more, I would say.

Since you want to keep volume high, here is the perfect program for you:
http://imgur.com/gallery/6Wcif

File: CEv2EWTWoAEcFyo.jpg (27KB, 500x372px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x372px

>>42351333
Thanks, I'll give this a shot

>>42351375
Don't just "give it a shot," follow it to a tee. It's a very high volume program, so you need to make sure to eat properly (plenty of protein, 400-500 kcal surplus) and sleep 8-10 hours a night).

>>42351397
Okay. How long until I start seeing some results?

>>42351413
3 months should show some decent results to strength and muscle mass. Don't expect to get huge in no time, though, that's not how it works. It's important to be patient. Rome wasn't built in a day.

>>42351419
I was into bodybuidling from ages 17-23. I lost most muscle mass due to not eating after a bad breakup + father dying. Since this is my second time coming back, will I see results faster?

>>42351456
You will see much faster results, yes.

>>42351471
Thanks man you've been very helpful today.

>>42351333
Jason Blaha? So it's shit, right?

>>42352485
The program is good, but Blaha is generally a moron. It's really just 5x5 with accessory work, it's not like the invented the whole program, he just added to it. Plenty of people have seen good results with the program.