Bf % estimate thread

File: hcUL1MWD.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x400px

>>42342317
gross%

50% boyfriend material

File: IMG_20170731_124942.jpg (377KB, 1530x1691px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1530x1691px

>>42342317
16ish%

What about me anons?

>>42342317
Somewhere in the 12-15% range but what the fuck is wrong with your chest?

File: 1500567878923.png (55KB, 163x147px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 163x147px

>>42342427
>16ish
The delusion on this board is nothing short of spectacular

>>42342430
Im preety dyel and im a lanket, also It may be because I was stretching that part of the chest to take the picture.

>>42342317
23%

File: 1663505-cage_gamespot_vid.jpg (97KB, 573x901px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 573x901px

>>42342458
They think that anyone who doesn't have a sixpack is a 16-20%.

Meanwhile, this is 17% IRL confirmed with a dexa scan.

>>42342427
you're like 10% stop fucking cutting and bulk up.
you wont get abs if you have literally 0 muscle

File: b7a1a9945fcebe1d63420611aa02ca9a--muscle-fitness-mens-fitness.jpg (22KB, 236x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 236x360px

>>42342475
theres no way im in the 20s

>>42342542
is this a picture for ants?!

File: BF-Male.jpg (191KB, 1157x721px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1157x721px

>>42342570
here

Problem with the bf compilation pictures is they are muscular men, beginners / intermediates can't use them to determine bf.

File: body-fat-percentage-chart-men-women.jpg (147KB, 721x479px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 721x479px

>>42342697
found a better one

>>42342776
~24%

>>42342776
21%

File: 1499204046749.jpg (674KB, 3378x672px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 3378x672px

>>42342317

File: 2977a15bff16f38b27927075f18d0591fdeab26a.jpg (1MB, 2786x3000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2786x3000px

>>42342737
>>42342667
>>42342542

Is there a version where the fat isn't replaced 1:1 by muscle mass? All these things are super useless because if I am at 15% and cut down to 10% I won't magically grow a sixpack, nice pecs and huge arms...

>>42343080
No idea, I just googled " Bodyfat percentage chart " and I just dumped the first couple that I found.

>>42342505
Thank you anon

File: IMG_1878.jpg (116KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 750x1334px

6'1 190

File: IMG_0110.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Please help me guys I need to know how much more to cut and what bf% I'm at

>>42343734
Cut? You're already dyel as fuck.

File: _20170731_142549.jpg (379KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1080x1920px

My scale said I was sitting at ~14%, wondering if that's fairly accurate.

>>42343788

62%

>>42343799
Sounds about right, thanks bud

>>42343662
Pls respond, my scale says 17%

>>42343788
yeah probably about 14%, get a caliper bro

>>42343662
>>42343734
>>42342776
>>42342427
>>42342317
You all have absolutely zero muscular development, why care for anything except FUCKING EATING and LIFTING?
No reason to think about body fat at this point.

>>42343915
I'm >>42342776 I was told that I should be cutting. Can I bulk even at this stage?

File: fucking sick.jpg (570KB, 1366x2503px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1366x2503px

This was before I started lifting and curious.

Now around 180lb and putting a little fat on but gaining muscle like a motherfucker

File: db7.png (206KB, 1233x957px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1233x957px

>>42342953
This is the worst one

>>42343958
The most important thing is to start lifting heavy.

File: 31kuly17.jpg (53KB, 714x960px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 714x960px

6'6" 241lbs down from 285lbs cutting since 1 february, US navy measurement and multiple location caliper tests but me at 21-22% BF, lifts are 1/2/3/4 if relevant

File: fatkunt.jpg (79KB, 720x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 720x960px

>>42344929
here is a pic from the start of my cut, 283lbs in this pic