[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

FPH

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 323
Thread images: 81

File: IMG_0275.jpg (238KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0275.jpg
238KB, 1024x768px
Daily reminder that HAES/fat acceptance is a way for liberals to turn their laziness into a social movement and forcibly silence anyone who disagrees.

>b-but there are fat conservatives! Trump is fat!

I know. But only liberals are pathetic enough to make it a social movement and rally in its favor. A liberal would rather attempt to be a """""revolutionary""""" and force society to adapt to their backwards ass world view than develop discipline and work towards a positive goal. Disgusting and pathetic.

>b-b-but I'm a liberal a-and

No. Pic related is what any liberal trying to argue with this thread looks like.
>>
The difference between fat right wingers and fat leftists is that post modernism and Marxism has riddled the leftist's brains with a particular strain of intellectually contagious ideology that causes them to support and defend any kind of backwards evil imaginable so long as it defies traditional convention. If societies tend to agree that something is probably a good policy (like health and fitness) a post modernist will immediately assume the opposite and if you can find any way to use it to sow a societal division a Marxist will drool at the opportunity and immediately side with the "oppressed" group. So obesity is a gem too good for them to pass up despite how ridiculous defending it appears to anyone not poisoned with ideology. The brain of the leftist is programmed to draw these connections reflexively and cannot second guess this instinct in even such an absurd case. Which does a good deal to defame their own image, so be glad.
>>
File: IMG_0342.jpg (80KB, 640x301px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0342.jpg
80KB, 640x301px
>>42120533
A well articulated point that is sure to draw the ire of cretins like those pictured here.
>>
File: 4d929cf03d74ccc9.png (22KB, 302x398px) Image search: [Google]
4d929cf03d74ccc9.png
22KB, 302x398px
>>42120533
Also the right winger usually knows that beeing fat is unhealthy, but he doesn´t give a fuck and would pay more for his medical bills.
The left winger claims to be "healthy" and wants the goverment->taxpayer to pay for his medical bills.
>>
File: IMG_0310.jpg (147KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0310.jpg
147KB, 1024x768px
>>42120783
Truth

Pic related
>>
HAES is not political.

The left and right hate these fat sacks equally.
>>
File: 1497878789063.jpg (38KB, 480x545px) Image search: [Google]
1497878789063.jpg
38KB, 480x545px
>>42120865
>The left and right hate these fat sacks equally.
There are only leftists supporting it...
>>
>>42120878
>There are only leftists supporting it...

Even if that was true, that doesn't mean "The Left" supports it. Get a clue.
>>
>>42120895
Show me a non-leftist that supports that crap.
>>
File: 1499649995808.png (335KB, 439x525px) Image search: [Google]
1499649995808.png
335KB, 439x525px
>>42120836
why can't ISIS make this their target?
>>
Oh look, it's another "I'm an out of shape /pol/tard who lacks the discipline and willpower to change myself, so I'm gonna go to /fit/ and post an irrelevant political thread to try to project my insecurities and shortcomings onto liberals" thread.

Have you ever once in your lives with a fat conservative man or woman? They proudly wear their fatness exactly the same as HAES retards do, just with a slight conservative spin on the "fat identity" that they try to embody.

It's most prevalent in hicks and "country" types, where every fat conservative man tries to claim he's just muscular and every fat conservative woman tries to claim she's a big beautiful country girl. Go try to be an in shape or only slight overweight person in most middle class or poor conservative areas, and people will consantly berate you for being an unhealthy weight, all while trying to feed you more because they honestly believe that their fat men are strong and that their fat women are womanly and embody some bizare "country values". Hence why red states are more overweight than blue states.

In less rednecky, more affluent conservative areas, they drop the fat pride schtick altogether and instead go for the full blown denial route. E.g. Trump being hilariously obese and yet paying off some Jew "doctor" to tell everyone that he's "healthy as an ox" when really he looks like a pregnant cow.

Fat people are terrible and need to be called on their shit. No one here would disagree with that. These "hurr durr fat liberals are the only bad fat people" threads are nothing but desperate, straw grasping attempts by equally out of shape righties to deflect attention away from their own pathetic degeneracy and inability to put down their forks and get off their asses.
>>
>>42121228

Also, I dare any of you to find an actual, statistically valid poll that confirms your outrageous claim that liberals "support" HAES type ideologies significantly more than conservatives. Anecdotes don't count. I'll wait.
>>
File: IMG_0404.jpg (131KB, 680x907px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0404.jpg
131KB, 680x907px
>>42121228
>>42121246
>typing multiple paragraphs in response to b8 anticipating an epic debate
>I'll wait *tips fedora*

Lmao look at this loser
>>
>>42121246
So would you say that fat studies courses in university are the product of right wing ideology?
>>
>>42121228
>>42121246
>ignoring my request
>>42120913
>>
>>42121228
>unironically using Jew as an insult
>unironically using the word degeneracy

As a liberal, you're kind of a huge piece of shit. Shut the fuck up.
>>
File: 1497694463333.jpg (84KB, 463x600px) Image search: [Google]
1497694463333.jpg
84KB, 463x600px
>>
File: 1497721553176.jpg (412KB, 1159x1280px) Image search: [Google]
1497721553176.jpg
412KB, 1159x1280px
>>42121317
>>
File: 1497652594121.jpg (99KB, 524x772px) Image search: [Google]
1497652594121.jpg
99KB, 524x772px
>>42121330
>>
I think there is a good and bad type of fat acceptance. Good type: yes being fat is unhealthy and you should change your lifestyle if you are fat, and yes it is generally unattractive. However, you are not subhuman and you don't deserve to be treated poorly for being fat. Bad type: being fat is perfectly normal and you shouldn't change your lifestyle or get skinnier because being fat is perfectly normal and okay
>>
>>42120421
Very true.

While there are far conservatives, all political fatties and HAES advocates are liberals.

What makes it this way?

Why is fatness so political for liberals, and does this tie into the other things they try to politicize?
>>
File: 1498111751045.png (389KB, 754x605px) Image search: [Google]
1498111751045.png
389KB, 754x605px
>>42121339
>>
>>42121228
This.

I live in South Georgia. The Hicks women all wear their rightism on their hamhock sized sleeve.

>"I"m just a country girl I eat country food, i'm too much woman for you to handle. I need a man who can handle ALL of this country girl."

The thing is, unless their inbred hick husbands power lift like gods, they can't "handle" them either. The hick men also consider you a pussy if you're some-what in shape.
>>
File: 1497914040342.jpg (620KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1497914040342.jpg
620KB, 1080x1080px
>>42121351
>>
>>
File: 1498159120632.png (85KB, 400x278px) Image search: [Google]
1498159120632.png
85KB, 400x278px
>>42121362
>>
>>42121358
Sounds way better than the hostility I get for being a man who lifts in Portland from these leftie manlets.
>>
>>42121383
>the debate

Holy shit lmao, what a loser
>>
>>42121376
Nigga....That's the kinda shit I need.
>>
File: 1499062415890.png (42KB, 701x469px) Image search: [Google]
1499062415890.png
42KB, 701x469px
>>42121399
>>
>>42121388
Fair enough.

We all can agree insecure people are horrible. Even though some of us lift because we're insecure.
>>
File: 1499879247081.gif (841KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]
1499879247081.gif
841KB, 320x180px
>>42121418
Kind of a dirty bulk...
>>
File: 1497595123715.jpg (223KB, 1536x1536px) Image search: [Google]
1497595123715.jpg
223KB, 1536x1536px
>>42121441
>>
>>42121441
Its just so hard to bulk on a clean diet.
>>
File: 1493232624744.jpg (42KB, 750x476px) Image search: [Google]
1493232624744.jpg
42KB, 750x476px
>>42121376
>only 2210 kcal
>>
>>42121388
I don't know what you're talking about bro.

I'm a conservative man in austin Texas and I fuck the shit out of liberal bitches all the time.

I saw this one sloot I dicked off of tinder holding hands with a Manlet in a Bernie Sanders shirt on campus the other day lmao.
>>
>>42121383
You're talking about the individual emotional reaction and argumentation of people who identify right or left. I'm talking about institutional and ideologically propagated dogma. You may not like it, but your political affiliation includes gender, ethnic, and fat studies/rights movements.
>>
File: 1498943353906.jpg (52KB, 480x600px) Image search: [Google]
1498943353906.jpg
52KB, 480x600px
>>42121451
Try french fries with less salt, they are pure carbs and fat.
>>
>>42121440
I agree. Fat rednecks and skinny fat hipsters are both part of insular circle jerk groups that hate on anyone who lives differently. Fuck em.
>>
File: 1499488672905.jpg (30KB, 640x941px) Image search: [Google]
1499488672905.jpg
30KB, 640x941px
>>42121424
>oh honey
>>
File: 1497694131505.jpg (362KB, 646x3543px) Image search: [Google]
1497694131505.jpg
362KB, 646x3543px
>>
File: 1497933990323.jpg (298KB, 1140x641px) Image search: [Google]
1497933990323.jpg
298KB, 1140x641px
>>
>>42121303

I didn't ignore your request, I answered it very directly. It's not my fault you can't read. I'll reiterate it for you anyways though.

Fat liberals whine about how being fat is good and acceptable in an organized, protest type fashion that only resonates within their little HAES type "movements". Fat consevatives whine about how being fat is good and acceptable within their homes and communities, and often successfully perpetuate such ideas within their homes and communities.

At least liberals manage to force their HAES fatties into congregating together on Tumblr or in fat studies campuses in the unused basement rooms of universities' social sciences departments. Conservatives, especially in poorer and more rural areas, allow and encourage it right inside their homes, and there are entire conservative communities which promote being fat as a community ideal.
>>
File: 1498114543314.jpg (335KB, 1242x1791px) Image search: [Google]
1498114543314.jpg
335KB, 1242x1791px
>Salad has no calories
If you drown it in dressing and croutons it has a lot...
>>
>>42121399
This gets me every time
>>
File: fat_flying.png (228KB, 536x367px) Image search: [Google]
fat_flying.png
228KB, 536x367px
>>
File: 1497605851870.jpg (43KB, 600x430px) Image search: [Google]
1497605851870.jpg
43KB, 600x430px
Every time I see some tumblrina writing "healthy at every sieze" and "Fat people can do anything thin people could do" I realy want to challenge them to a triathlon or even only cycling.
I want to show physicly show them their limits and warf them.
>>
>>42121468

Except that's not true. Fat acceptance isn't "institutionalized" amongst liberals just because you want it to be. Fat studies type classes are not equivalent to universities being "institutionilzed" with fat acceptance. The vast, VAST majority of university students never take a class even remotely resembling any of the variations of fat/women/etc stufies courses, and most of them don't even know that their school even offers such preposterous classes. Saying that fat acceptance is institutionalized at universities or anywhere else would be like saying that a company with 10,000 employed suffers from an institutional racism because they accidently one time hired one guy who turned out to go around calling black people niggers to their faces. Just because it exists doesn't mean it's institutionalized, especially when in reality, even though it exists, it's almost entitely marginalized.
>>
>>42121441

That dog. Every time.
>>
File: 1498793991900.jpg (171KB, 2623x971px) Image search: [Google]
1498793991900.jpg
171KB, 2623x971px
>>
File: 1499062540638.png (455KB, 969x549px) Image search: [Google]
1499062540638.png
455KB, 969x549px
>>42121638
>guess who is wich
>>
File: 1499271973731.jpg (108KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
1499271973731.jpg
108KB, 640x1136px
>>42121655
>>
File: 1497693604481.jpg (143KB, 780x1029px) Image search: [Google]
1497693604481.jpg
143KB, 780x1029px
>>42121665
>>
>>42121344
Gtfo
>>
>>42121424

what is thermodynamics.
>>
>>42121376
This is why I hate skellies.
OVER 2200 calories. It also tastes fucking amazing and can be easily finished in one sitting because it's a liquid. One of these with your typical skelly diet WILL make you gain weight.
>>
>>42121703
It will also give you high chloesterol, higher rik for diabetes and other shit...
>>
>>42121723
Has the same amount of sugar as a 2L of coke
>>
>>42121741
Who drinks 2L of coke per day?
>>
File: xytoiplif79z.jpg (24KB, 423x412px) Image search: [Google]
xytoiplif79z.jpg
24KB, 423x412px
>>
>>42121756
Mandatory for Americans
>>
>>42121615
Except that it is true. These studies/rights movements are supported and propagated through leftist academic and governmental institutions. They are the direct product of leftist ideology and are completely in synch with leftist political dogma.

You are looking at this through individualistic lenses. "Fat right wingers say blah blah blah", " the majority of liberals are actually blah blah blah". Justify your political views however you want to but it doesn't change the fact that your ideology supports, funds, propagates, etc... fat acceptance, fat pride, and fat rights movements. That is the undeniable factual truth of the matter whether you like it or not.
>>
>>42121761
That might explain your diabetes rates.
I don´t drink any shugar containing drinks out of training at all.
When training I sometimes drink a small (0,25l)energy drink to prevent bonkering.
>>
>>42121516
how much fucking dressing do they put on?

thats like 1.5lbs of chicken worth of falories
>>
File: bonkering.png (24KB, 938x419px) Image search: [Google]
bonkering.png
24KB, 938x419px
>>42121781
>>
>>42121797
I have no idea, I make my salads myself and use only vinegar
>>42121814
Biker slang, hitting the wall aka running out of calories.
>>
>>42121797
At most restaurants they drown the salad in dressing, easily tripling the calories. That's why if you're health conscious and want a salad at a restaurant you have to ask for the dressing on the side
>>
>>42121829
Sure it is homo.
>>
>>42121833
>Sure it is homo.
Both versions suck.
Your body starts shutting down...
>>
File: SPICE.png (186KB, 318x558px) Image search: [Google]
SPICE.png
186KB, 318x558px
>>42121461
Time to renew my ACS card
>>
guys how do u eat out a fat pussy it seems bigger than a regular one
>>
>>42121926
tits or gtfo attentionwhore skelly
>>
>>42121383
>the left does something retarded
>t-the right does it too!
>you just don't see it or hear about it or know!
>but I do!
Mental gymnastics
>>
I'm a liberal in the classical meaning of the term and I think fat acceptance is bullshit.

The modern left isn't liberal, they simply claim to be.
>>
>>42121228
yea texas and a large majority of my friends parents are fat as fuck and generally white conservatives.

bisqets and gravy for breakfest, fried chicken for lunch (fried anything really), two beers with dinner and a different kind of pie for desert every day.
>>
>ITT fat liberal sperges out over HAES being part of his political affiliation and uses zero sources and his own opinions to back up his claims that reeeee it's all conservatives fault
>>
>>42121962
>a different kind of pie for desert every day
sounds pretty good though to be honest
>>
>>42121830
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/calorie-counts-accurate/story?id=18164180
Fast food is much more accurate on calorie counts than restaurant food, and "low cal" options in restaurants can go as 400 or more calories more than they say.

McDonalds will save us all
>>
>>42121703
That shit is so syrupy and disgusting.

Skellies can't eat that shit and shouldn't because they'll need their leg amputated like all the other fatties that consume that shit
>>
File: 1439855164699.jpg (41KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]
1439855164699.jpg
41KB, 720x720px
>>42121563
>Looks like we get to share a personal space bubble today!
>Hope you like cuddling!
>>
>>42122112
Always carry a pencil and put down the armrest...
>>
File: liberalhero.godswork.jpg (344KB, 800x538px) Image search: [Google]
liberalhero.godswork.jpg
344KB, 800x538px
>>42120421
>Daily reminder that HAES/fat acceptance is a way for liberals to turn their laziness into a social movement and forcibly silence anyone who disagrees.
lol us liberals are the ones working hardest to end the obesity epidemic. when was the last time you heard of a conservative group performing public outreach nutrition education? people like myself want government-funded nutritional education programs for students, the poor, and really everyone.

the "fat acceptance movement" is something that only exists on the internet, in very secluded corners. true progressives are out in your communities, working to end the scourge that is obesity.
>>
Off the top of my head, places I've seen HAES bullshit recently
BBC
The Daily Show with Trevor Noah
Adam Ruin Everything
HuffPost
Chelsea Clinton
Also, body acceptance is explicitly a feminist ideal
Yeah, I'm having trouble finding the thread too.

Now this would have nothing to do with nothing, but I'm tired of seeing the same argument over and over again. So I'll fuel it I guess.
Dems are stupid on fat, Repubs are stupid on global warming.
>>
>>42122148
>conservative group performing public outreach nutrition education?
We want that integrated in school education.
Some of us are pro fat-tax.
We want inshureance companies to charge fatties extra.

Noone on the right pushes "fat acceptance" as well as a part of you leftists.
>>
>>42122148
>the "fat acceptance movement" is something that only exists on the internet, in very secluded corners.

Lol no go to any college campus. Start advertising a "Get bikini ready! Free Fitness Assessment!" In January. Watch the hate and butthurt flow in.
>>
>>42122226
>Some of us are pro fat-tax.

>oh plz daddy gubmant force people to pay money
>we TRUST YOU DADDAH GUBMANT that you will use this money to magically make people less fat

If you support more taxes, you are a commie.
>>
>>42121351
>#fat
>#backfat
>#fat from the side
very thorough
>>
>>42122148
>the "fat acceptance movement" is something that only exists on the internet

Daily reminder
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/world/europe/london-bans-ads-with-unrealistic-body-images.html
"Beach Body Ready" is now wrongthink. I'm not shocked though. Sadiq's a conservative, right?
>>
>>42121764

Except, again, it's not. You saying it's true doesn't make it true. You're looking at it through individualistic lenses just as much as I am, and you wanna know why? Because that is literally the only way to look at it. There are no legitimate organizations or institutions which support HAES, left or right.

A bunch of fat people getting together and calling themselves HAES isn't an institution, it's just a bunch of fat individuals getting together and giving themselves a name. Similarly, conservatives perpetuate fat identity bullshit on a community level. The only difference is that liberal HAES congregate at universities and on Tumblr, because there aren't enough of them in their immediate home communities to perpetuate their fat identity stuff, so they can *only* do it when they're congregated together. Conservative HAES don't have to wait to congregate, because they do it rampantly within their homes and set ridiculous standards amongst their hick communities for what degree of obesity qualifies you as a "strong country man" or a "beautiful country woman".

>Justify your political views however you want to but it doesn't change the fact that your ideology supports, funds, propagates, etc... fat acceptance, fat pride, and fat rights movements.

This is a baseless claim. You probably observed HAES liberals somewhere, and then from that anecdotal observation, you concocted this fantasy where all, or at least a sizable fraction of, liberals and liberal institutions support HAES. Go ahead and show me a liberal institution that funds and/or propogates HAES and fat acceptance. A HAES institution that identifies as liberal doesn't count, since you're claiming that some intangible, ethereal core institution of liberalism itself is somehow directly connected to and is funding and propogating HAES.

You are trying so, so hard to politically polarize an issue that is effectively identically distributed amongst all people.
>>
File: 1499275166614.jpg (168KB, 890x876px) Image search: [Google]
1499275166614.jpg
168KB, 890x876px
>>42122252
National socialist, not commie.
>>
>>42121947

Oh sorry, I didn't know that your anecdotes were more factually accurate than my anecdotes. Oh wait, they're not. This entire thread has been argued with anecdotes. You don't get decide that my anecdotes are invalid just because I used them proficiently to disprove your anecdotes.
>>
File: 1439135506124.gif (954KB, 285x235px) Image search: [Google]
1439135506124.gif
954KB, 285x235px
>>42121563
>Hope you like cuddling!
This is both disgusting and hilarious.
>>
File: canola.jpg (53KB, 735x735px) Image search: [Google]
canola.jpg
53KB, 735x735px
>>42122226
>We want that integrated in school education.
i was under the impression you wanted to end public education, a la devos
>Some of us are pro fat-tax.
very leftist of you. i want sin taxes placed on snack foods and sugary beverages, and fines imposed on snackfood corporations :)
>We want inshureance companies to charge fatties extra.
the only right-leaning thing you've said lol

are you sure you're a conservative? xD
>>
File: 1499056103246.jpg (92KB, 640x920px) Image search: [Google]
1499056103246.jpg
92KB, 640x920px
>>42122326
For some reason these are the same people that complain about "manspreading"...
>>
>>42122346
>i want sin taxes
And I want a tax on trannies payable in boipucci but we aren't all going to get what we want
>>
>>42122148
>take money from normal people
>to pay normal people
>to teach fatfucks stuff you can learn online for free
once you realize that critical thinking literally burns calories, you'll be one step close to understanding the epidemic
>>
>>42121592
why push it so far ? You could just challenge them to go up 5 flights of stairs in less than 5 minutes.

They can always argue that most regular ppl can't win a triathlon or cycle for any significant amount of time.
>>
File: 1499889155647.png (99KB, 1013x169px) Image search: [Google]
1499889155647.png
99KB, 1013x169px
>>42122346
>i was under the impression you wanted to end public education
That are the anarchocapitalists and minarchists, calling them right wing would only make sense from a economical perspective.
>sin taxes
You shouldn´t pay extra if you manage to still be healthy.
Also these taxes would make it harder for skellies to bulk and hit many people that are healthy.
>sure you're a conservative
NS is not exactly conservatism.
>>
>>42121665
>breaking news
>researchers suggest birds can fly only because they have wings
>>
>>42120421
Both conservative and liberal fatties are fucking shit and terrible people.
The liberal hams are angry at fit people and conservatives
The conservative hams are angry at fit people and liberals
Both are disgusting their fattness goes above petty politics and as a human race fats who arent willing to become fit should be used as chemical test subjects.
>>
File: 1498736917561.png (132KB, 720x835px) Image search: [Google]
1498736917561.png
132KB, 720x835px
>>42122437
Another idea:
>drive to bumfuck nowhere
>start biking with downhill
>end up like 500m lower than when started
>fatty needs to climb at least 500m to get back to car
>fatty can´t cheat since no network

If you want to torture them even more:
>rent roadbike with standard chainset
>and 21-11 cassette
>>
>>42122513
Effects all of the human race*
>>
>>42122278
I can't do this forever. Fat acceptance and various other forms of identity politics are openly and overtly advanced by neo-marxist/postmodernist dogma which is a leftist ideology. That's not intangible or ethereal. That is very much supported by their own text. You want a single institution? Google fat studies courses and find yourself a list of universities that offer it. Are these universities "liberal institutions"? Not really the point, because these leftist courses are offered through a tax payer funded institution and are therefore institutional. I get the feeling you don't know what "institutional" means. But these are legitimate institutions that propagate leftist fat acceptance rhetoric and I do hope that satisfies you.

What else did you say? Just that same anecdotal blah blah blah about fat conservatives? OK, there are fat and proud conservatives and fat and proud leftists. I have never said otherwise. That has never been my point and I do not understand why you cannot seem to comprehend the difference between political dogma about X and personal attitudes about X. Redneck fat pride is incidental to their political leanings. As far as I am aware there is nothing in even the farthest of far right extremist dogma that advocates obesity. Unfortunately racism, nationalism, and fascism can be found. But not fat acceptance. Do fascists make up the majority of right wingers? No. But is fascism a rightwing ideology? Yes. Same thing with fat acceptance and leftwing ideology. Just deal with it for Christ's sake. You're acting like a child with all of this stubborn obstinance.

I have to go sleep. I can't do this forever. Enjoy the last word if you want it.
>>
>>42120421
I'm a liberal and I despise fat people. Fuck their fat acceptance horseshit.
>>
>>42122786
Nobody said all liberals are like this, but all fat acceptance hamplanets are left wing liberals.
>>
>>42120421
I dont know pham, i actually feel bad for fatties on HAES/fat acceptance, they are so deluded that denial is their form to cope with their sad lives.
Also every day fatties are more common, out 7/10 people on the bus are fat, i see this trend daily, once young people hit the 20's, they think their metabolism will be the same as when their were teens thus they get fat easily, we need some sort of food education on high school 2bh.
>>
>>42121376
Can i use this to bulk?
>>
>>42122626

>(((their))) text

This is exactly the problem. You're acting like liberals share some kind of fucking hivemind. You think there are liberal textbooks that liberals as a whole subscribe to and feed off of? Are you absolutely insane?

>these leftist courses are offered through a tax payer funded institution and are therefore institutional

Nice semantics backtracking. Again, having one single class taught in the women's studies department of the social sciences college of an entire university is not instutionalization. Instutionalization implies that a larger institution is heavily endorsing and pushing an ideology. Universities themselves are not in any way shape or form endorsing HAES.

Again, you are grasping at straws trying to push this "HAES institutionalization" bullshit. THAT is what I was attacking in the OP. You're trying to split hairs to justify the nonsense posted in the OP.
>>
>>42123159
>You think there are liberal textbooks that liberals as a whole subscribe to and feed off of? Are you absolutely insane?
I never said anything even remotely similar to that. Sick ad hominin bro.

>semantics backtracking
We're going to sit here and argue about what institutional means?

in·sti·tu·tion·al
ˌinstəˈt(y)o͞oSH(ə)n(ə)l/Submit
adjective
of, in, or like an institution or institutions.
"institutional care"

If an institution offers fat acceptance courses those fat acceptance courses are institutional.

Just answer me this. Is fat acceptance in any way a part of left wing ideology? Yes or no?
>>
>>42121424
>once your body becomes accustomed to your weight your body changes hormones to make you hungrier

This doesn't refute the point though. Eat fewer calories, reach your goal, then maintain until you set a new set point. Was that so fucking hard?
>>
>>42123354
>sick ad hominin bro

Jesus Christ I'm losing my edge. I didn't even spell ad hominem anywhere near correctly and I don't think you even made an ad hominem. I really do need to go to sleep. Fun talking with you you dirty commie cocksucker.
>>
>>42121344
Fuck off
>>
>>42122148
>he thinks people are fat because they lack "education"

stupid liberal, when will you learn the concept of personal responsibility? Everyone knows you're not supposed to stuff yourself with junk food, people do it because they are weak-willed and lazy, period.
>>
>>42122191
>Adam Ruin Everything
I'm curious about this one, most of what I have seen of that program has been bullshit with a condescending tone.
>>
File: 1435707570126.jpg (36KB, 297x365px) Image search: [Google]
1435707570126.jpg
36KB, 297x365px
>>42120421
bad goyim, accept these fat people for who they are
>>
File: 1495129022183.png (452KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1495129022183.png
452KB, 500x500px
>>42121365
vote liberal, its easier than working.
>>
>>42122148
>lol us liberals are the ones working hardest to end the obesity epidemic
you mean enabling it with your shitty policies.
>>
>>42120421
They're pitiable. No one actually enjoys being fat. It puts such a strain on you.
>>
>>42121317
Not gonna lie. . .
Looking at that thumbnail, I %100 thought that was some sort of taco/chilli bowl.
>>
File: shut up nerd.gif (2MB, 400x286px) Image search: [Google]
shut up nerd.gif
2MB, 400x286px
>>42121228
>>42121383
>>42121615
>>42122278
>>42123159
>>
>>42121365
Found the fatty.
>>
>>42121399
Consistently funny.
>>
File: 70 inch pants.png (403KB, 502x1363px) Image search: [Google]
70 inch pants.png
403KB, 502x1363px
>>
>>42121756
Boogie?
>>
>>42122097
Switch out burgers at local bar for wraps with chicken or salads.
fewer beers each outing
waitress starts giving me the dressing on the side, never asked for this
>guy thinks she's trolling me
>I like to think of her as my gains fairy
>bro says she wants the D which I don't believe since women don't like broke hairy backed dudes.
>>
>>42123657
>70 inch pants
Meanwhile I can´t get any decent 26-27 inch ones...
>>
>>42122261
>modern day leftist
>commie
Pick both
>>
>>42121756
My wife drinks easily 5-10 cans of soda a day.

She wonders why she can't lose weight. Well, she used to wonder, now she just doesn't care.

She used to be fit as fuck... Never get married anons, it's a trap.

Leaving her next year. Gonna cost me half my shit and payment for the rest of my life...
>>
>>42123581
>face cover
I didn't know I had this fetish.
>>
>>42123753
You could rent a self-storage compartment and act like someone has stolen all your stuff.
If it was "stolen" your wife can´t have it.

Or you could gift it to a friend that gives it back after divorce is settled.
>>
>>42123803
I'm doing that with my cars, I love my toys and if she gets vindictive I know that's what she'll try and take.

Couldn't give a fuck about everything else. It's all useless shit she brought on credit cards anyway. She can take it.

It's the alimony that's gonna kill me. Fucking bitch.
>>
>>42120547
That asian guy who just went for the food always make me laugh. Dark skinned cutie in glasses on the left as well.
>>
>>42120421
>never been to the south confirmed

Plenty of grossly obese Trump supporters down here that insist their fat is healthy. They just don't like Tumblr because Tumblr is usually to the left otherwise.

HAES isn't left or right. It's just for dumb, lazy, fat people who don't have the willpower to fix themselves.
>>
>>42123386

What does "part of left leaning ideology" even mean? HAES is a part of HAES ideology, that is it. It is not a part of mainstream liberal ideology, and it absolutely is not a mainstay of what is generally viewed as liberal ideology.

The OP suggested that all liberals were HAES enthusiasts and supporters, which is incredibly similar to what you are doing by suggesting that HAES is anywhere near close to a mainstay of mainstream liberal ideology.

I never once argued against the true observation that HAES people are usually liberal. What I did argue against was the idea that fat acceptance and the general principles of HAES are unique to the left. I attacked OP's notion that fat acceptance is a deeply liberal ideology by presenting the equivalent manifestation of fat acceptance that exists amongst fat conservatives. The OP claimed that:

>only liberals are pathetic enough to make it a social movement and rally in its favor. A liberal would rather attempt to be a """""revolutionary""""" and force society to adapt to their backwards ass world view than develop discipline and work towards a positive goal. Disgusting and pathetic.

I pointed out that this exact same stuff happens in fat consevative communities. The concluding statement of my original comment posited that amongst fat accepting liberals, fat acceptance is treated as a social movement, whereas amongst fat accepting conservatives, it's treated as familial and communal culture. So ultimately, the actions and mindsets of fat accepting liberals and conservatives is effectively identical, once is just a forced movement whereas the other is a forced culture. And a big reason for that is that the fat liberals tend to be in higher population, urban areas, so they're only option is to go outwards and act as "activists", whereas the fat conservatives tend to be in lower population density, rural areas, so they're only option is to go inwards with their fat acceptance.
>>
File: 1494492672660.gif (2MB, 500x222px) Image search: [Google]
1494492672660.gif
2MB, 500x222px
>>42121491
The worst part is reading this. You have two ways of reading it.
>1. In a sarcastic-bitchy liberal voice where she tries to be funny and mask the fact that her life is in danger.
>2. In a serious tone where this is actually how far gone she is with the HAES lies.
Either way, I pop a blood vessel reading it in anger.
>>
>>42123833
>brought on credit cards
Make sure to seperate these cards from your bank accounts...
>>
>>42123833
could you quit your job and have no income?
I mean did she not have a job at all? you should only have to pay the difference between what you and she made...
>>
>>42123861
>What does "part of left leaning ideology" even mean? HAES is a part of HAES ideology, that is it. It is not a part of mainstream liberal ideology, and it absolutely is not a mainstay of what is generally viewed as liberal ideology.
chelsey clinton
women's studies
all liberal arts colleges

It may not be part of YOUR mainstay ,but it is a big part of the movement and you be no true scotsmanning all over the place
>>
>>42123891
Yeah, the extra year of not leaving her yet is to sort it finances before all this goes down. Thanks for the advise tho.

>>42123930
I've earned over twice what she did at her highest wages for our entire marriage, and she's had long spells of unemployment.

It's not like I'm gonna be paying her to live for free, but it's still gonna piss me off making those payments for her lazy fat ass.

Thanks for the replies anons, I'm kinda lit and I haven't discussed this with anyone yet. This felt pretty good.
>>
>>42124017
I mean I don't know how long you've been together this will affect it but really.
>quit job (assuming you have savings and a friend/family to hold them)
>divorce
>you and her both have no income
>split half your shit but no alimony since no income
>get new job. fuck i'd rather start a new career than give free money to someone I hate
>That last line is a bit biased since I hate my job
>sister said I should find something to do I like, I suggest going back to school for dietician since I already read about fitness
>says I can't make much at that
>wonder if I can off myself in a way that looks accidental so family can get insurance and pay off my student loans
>>
>>42124114
How about asking the boss to fire you and reemploy you after divorce is settled?
>>
>>42123939

No, you're grasping at straws. I literally just confirmed AGAIN in the comment you just responded to that HAES is a heavily liberal movement. That is not a no true scotsman argument. You're the one who's wildly conflating separate ideas; i.e. you're somehow conflating HAES and fat acceptance with some overaeching "liberal ideology" that you perceive to exist. Your examples are a great indication of this. Chelsea Clinton is one single person. "All liberal arts colleges"? Are you kidding me? So liberal arts colleges are THE face of liberalism as a whole now and no one else who calls themselves a liberal matters? Even with that aside, how many liberal arts colleges themselves endorse HAES? Not just their women's studies department, but the entire school as a whole?

It's not part of my mainstay, and it's not part of the overarching liberal demographic's ideologies either. And once again, the point in the OP that I was refuting was the claim that the aspects which define HAES are unique to liberals. This is demonstrably false.
>>
>>42124130
the clintons are mainstream
The fact that every college has a women's studies dept means it is mainstream
You remind me of an idiot who asks why i'm not a feminist and assumes I hate equal rights.
All for equal rights, but I can't be under the same label as those idiots who advocate male castration day OR the people who don't openly renounce them.
>>
>>42121424
>the theory
>continues on treating it like fact
>>
>>42121441
I WASH M'SELF WITH A RAG ON A STICK
>>
>>42124114
I'll look into that anon, thanks
>>
>>42121592
Just ask them to stand up and make 50 bodyweight squats.
But even 50 will be overkill i guess.
>>
>>42121962
>tfw live in Waco
can confirm this
>>
>>42124188

The Clintons are mainstream, which means that one tweet that Chelsea made one time has now canonized HAES in mainstream liberalism? Holy shit.

Lots of colleges have women's studies departments, yes. We were discussing HAES and fat acceptance prevelance amongst colleges. How many colleges have women's studies departments is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. How many colleges fat acceptance centric fat studies courses would be relevant. Lots of colleges offer engineering, art, history, sciences, etc. They also offer things like kineseology, nutritional science, etc. By your logic, because lots of colleges offer lots of these things, they are centric to liberal ideology as a whole. That would be very contradictory that both kineseology/nutritional sciences courses - which explicitly teach things like calories in calories out and healthy body weight rangeds - and HAES centric fat studies are cornerstones of mainstream liberalism, no? Once again, you are wildly grasping at straws by trying to conflate HAES as a piece of mainstream liberal doctrine.
>>
>>42124188
>The fact that every college has a women's studies dept means it is mainstream
you can get a Department of Assfucking if there's enough support and money
>>
>>42122361
Tattoos on her:
老婆 - old woman
希望 - hope; wish; aspiration

Lol.
>>
>>42124188
I can't tell if you're trolling or actually retarded.

Just because the Clinton's are famous doesn't mean opinions one of them puts out on twitter reflects the opinions of the entirety of people who have ever supported or voted for them.

Having a women's studies department doesn't mean the university endorses HAES or even the stereotypical, over-the-top views you see regurgitated on /pol/. A large part of the tenure system is allowing professors to express opinions without fear of backlash from university administrators who object to those opinions. Its so different ideas can be debated in an open forum. Good ideas survive the test of time. Bad ideas, like HAES, die quickly and are thereafter made fun of. Nobody in mainstream academia supports HAES, not even in women's studies departments. They'd probably have a bit to say about FPH, though.

Stupid faggots co-opt movements and labels all the time. Go to /v/ and ask them what they think about "gamers" who only play Pokemon Go and Call of Duty. The person who thinks men should be castrated gets no love from any feminist with any credibility - retweets from insignifcant, poor nobodies don't count as credibility.
>>
>>42121228
Makes me wanna go around the country and start a strongman competition and watch these fat ''''''''''strongman'''''''''' go to snap city to snatch some buffet tickets and die soon after due to inability to get proper medical care.
>>
Just to keep it clear who's saying what, this >>42124308 was my original comment, and these were my other comments:

>>42121228
>>42121383
>>42121515
>>42121615
>>42122278
>>42122321
>>42123159
>>42123861
>>42124130
>>42124308

The following two comments were not me, but I appreciate the support boyos:

>>42124324
>>42124378
>>
>>42120946
because ISIS is controlled by Israel and the CIA
>>
>>42124188
>Mainstream
>If it's in every campus

Hey there are math courses on every campus that must mean it is mainstream and everyone likes math and it is everyone's favorite subject.
>>
>>42124804
>math not mainstream
>>
File: kosh_vs_right.jpg (2MB, 1687x3008px) Image search: [Google]
kosh_vs_right.jpg
2MB, 1687x3008px
>>42124378
Basically he is using guilt by association and false dichotomy fallacies. I lean Democrat myself but even I am a realist about how stupid Liberals can be. Just as I am sure the kosher conservatives piss off the Alt right with their stupidity.

It's dumb to place everyone in the same camp because they support a party.
>>
File: IMG_0034.png (542KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0034.png
542KB, 600x800px
>>42120421
>>
File: 1483012268450.jpg (169KB, 457x381px) Image search: [Google]
1483012268450.jpg
169KB, 457x381px
>>42124810
But according to other Anon if it has a department on every campus it's mainstream.
>>
>>42124884
yes, he's right.

if every college in america is offering courses in something it is generally considered mainstream
>>
>>42121563
>be me
>on a plane
>trying to avoid accidental eye contact with strangers
>hambeast comes to me
>she has the middle seat
>slowly turns her head to me
>"HOPE YOU LIKE CUDDLING!"
>"y-you too"
>go to restroom and lock myself in for entire four hours
>>
File: IMG_0918.jpg (60KB, 976x598px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0918.jpg
60KB, 976x598px
>>42121228
>>
>>42121278

Lol u got owned m8

Go back to your mothers basement
>>
File: 1499731701137.png (215KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]
1499731701137.png
215KB, 500x380px
>>42121228
this is genius b8 right?
>>
>>42121449
>that look of content
ugh i just vomited in my mouth a little
>>
>>42122252
Why are you against fat tax? They should pay more in healthcare and in taxes because they are a burden on the system itself. Why should you have to pay more for their problems if you are in shape? It should be less money to taxes for being fit and more for being fat.
>>
>>42121491
panel 1 - yes, obviously you've never moved.
panel 4 - just because you ate 0 calories one day doesn't mean it makes up for eating 6000-10,000 on the others
panel 5-8 - and this is how you justify being overweight. Like many overweight people. Not unique thinking at all.
panel 9-10 - such a sad reality, to split hairs like this "I'm not as disabled as XYZ people with the same BMI! So I'm not doing so bad."
>>
File: rachdi.png (62KB, 513x381px) Image search: [Google]
rachdi.png
62KB, 513x381px
>>42121503
She won't be doing an update episode with TLC last I heard :(
>>
File: 1497231428780.png (80KB, 475x455px) Image search: [Google]
1497231428780.png
80KB, 475x455px
>>42122321
>your anecdotes were more factually accurate than my anecdotes.
>defeats own argument in opening point
its almost as if many anecdotal cases combine to form a stereotype, like dumb, fat, feminist libtards.
>>
Oh look, more /pol/shit in /fit/. I want /pol/ to go away and defend treason somewhere else.
>>
File: 1499899352722.jpg (78KB, 358x451px) Image search: [Google]
1499899352722.jpg
78KB, 358x451px
>>42121424
So genetics can decide this set point thing but not your gender?
>>
>>42120421

Fatfuckery and rationalization thereof know no party. /pol/ and tumblr are two sides of the same cringe-inducing coin. Go outside, faggot.
>>
>>42125316

>what is condescending sarcasm

Are you legitimately autistic? I'm pretty sure not being able to pick up on blatant sarcasm is a legit symptom of autism. M
You might wanna get that checked out.
>>
>>42121615
Oh sweetie, honey pie. You are so cutie naive. Many of us sugar bears used to be like you.

The real world disagrees and it's so obvious. Fuck right wing fatties, but at least they don't try to enforce their agenda through hate speech. Their are idiots and there are bizarre acceptance fascists. The left being the former and the most cancerous.
>>
>>42125358
>looking for logic from people in denial
Nothing against americans but they are ridiculously out of touch with reality. It seems that wealth elevated plebes into sphere of waking dreams...
>If i choose to be a dragon, I AM !
Except you're not.
>>
>>42124884
>But according to other Anon if it has a department on every campus it's mainstream.

You are retarded. I hope you are aware of this fact.
>>
>>42124810
>>42124884
>>42125571
You two retards realize you're basically BOTH right except not talking about the same thing, right ?
One of you is talking about culturally mainstream (ex : "Hip-Hop is part of the mainstream culture")
One of you is talking about educational mainstream (ex : "Subatomic resistance of geological materials, how the fuck did you end up studying that ?") Who's gonna be surprised if you have a bsc in math... ?
>>
>>42125666
fat acceptance is both though
>>
>>42121449
She's swole as fuck, look at "Dat 'ceps vein (TM)"!
>>
File: IMG_0405.jpg (119KB, 538x722px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0405.jpg
119KB, 538x722px
2 HOT 4 HANDLES
>>
File: IMG_0408.jpg (103KB, 500x746px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0408.jpg
103KB, 500x746px
>>
File: IMG_0413.jpg (33KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0413.jpg
33KB, 320x320px
that poor bar.
>>
File: complacent.jpg (73KB, 960x538px) Image search: [Google]
complacent.jpg
73KB, 960x538px
>>42121424
>theory
>>
File: IMG_0411.jpg (88KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0411.jpg
88KB, 500x667px
someone please explain me what's wrong with her "belly button".
>>
File: IMG_0414.jpg (49KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0414.jpg
49KB, 500x281px
CURVES
>>
>>42125815
It's a cosplay it's supposed to be a jewel or something
>>
>>42121228
Obesity is an issue in every part of the country, broski. Nearly every community has that crab mentality, even in southern california. Granted there's more fitness types out here, but they're
still outnumbered. /fph/ works great for men, it's the type of motivation that works for us. I went from dadbod to ottermode in a year. Working on athletic mode now. /fph/ is great for meme fuel and reinforcement.
>>
>>42125442
>thinking people can read tone through text
>what is poe's law
You're the only autistic one here retard.
>>
>>42121228
The funny thing about /pol/ is that they're not just fat, when you look at pictures from their meetings, it's very clear that 95% of them are fucking Mexicans. They hate themselves as much as fatties hate themselves.
>>
>>42125882
That's not true at all. You're only saying that because of the one /pol/ meetup in NY that was filled with nonwhite (majority Asians for some reason) manlets.
>>
>>42125672
hum... In the US perhaps.
The thing is that literally 1 in 2 person is obese over there i think (47% if im not mistaken, i read an article recently but would be willing to doubt it)
If society is 100% overweight, you can bet people are going to accept it. /fit/izens will be outcast by number alone.
>>
File: IMG_1806.jpg (85KB, 640x853px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1806.jpg
85KB, 640x853px
>>42125968

Since we've gone off topic
>>
File: IMG_1803.jpg (92KB, 640x465px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1803.jpg
92KB, 640x465px
>>42125970
>>
File: IMG_1802.png (611KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_1802.png
611KB, 640x1136px
>>42125975
>>
>>42122234
They'll only be hateful until they realize they can achieve that too. If you suggest swimming for a hamplanet because water helps people of that body shape. A little progress and they'll want to go further
>>
>>42122191
THIS episode?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKNmTjRBwfk
>>
>>42124130
HAES is an offshoot of the latest wave of feminism. All the major advocates subscribe to the same ideology. Not all feminists are HAES activists, but many of the HAES activists are also feminists.
>>
>>42126071
what does
>think FIT
mean?
>>
>>42125975

>This femme eats big

Looks legit
>>
File: download.jpg (9KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
download.jpg
9KB, 225x225px
>>42126071
GenETIcS ExPAinS MoSt THe WiGht DifFreNcE BeTwEEn PeoPlE
>>
>>42126071
The comments are fucking gold
>>
File: 1497591811099.jpg (91KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]
1497591811099.jpg
91KB, 1080x720px
>>42125910
>Th-Th-That's not true at all!
Sorry, /pol/ looks like this instead.
>>
>>42124829
>that golden hair shield guy from youtube.

He literally said he is a liberal. Nice try though.
>>
File: IMG_2100.png (53KB, 744x398px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2100.png
53KB, 744x398px
>>42125979
Datz proppa ork speak alroight!
>>
>>42124452
Just to be clear, I left the thread after I called you a dirty commie cocksucker. You've been arguing other people ever since.
>>
>>42121228
>it's an "anon gets upset about /pol/ and derails the thread with needless political strife whilst complaining that /pol/ is derailing the thread with needless political strife" episode

l o l
o
l
>>
>>42120421
"No real Scotsman" the post
>>
File: 1499490948764.jpg (131KB, 600x401px) Image search: [Google]
1499490948764.jpg
131KB, 600x401px
>>42126203
>/pol/
Kekistanis are more reddit than /pol/ friendo.
>>
>>42125805
Fucking yikes
>>
>>42120913
You still don't understand. The fact that people of the left support HAES does not mean The Left supports HAES.

I think your brain is broken.
>>
>>42123619
same
>>
I've posted about this fat bitch before, but have a new story
> Be nursing home cook
> Fat bitch resident is supposed to be on a small portion, diabetic diet
> lol, yeah right
> Knows if she asks for more food, she'll be marked as non-compliant and her doctor will rip her ass
> She starts doing better when I'm instructed to inform her that she'll be non-compliant and why instead of just telling the nurse.
> Or so I thought
> Notice that she loiters after she's done eating, constantly glancing at me
> Watch her where she can't see me
> Not sure if she just asks or if she is harassing her table mate, who is almost thirty years older then her and extremely thin, for her dessert
> Of course after the fat bitch eats it, she puts it back by the older woman's plate.
> We have to mark down what they eat, one of the things we're instructed to look for, especially in the really old residents, is sudden loss of appetite
> Means they're probably going to die soon
> Charts for these two women are now messed up because fat bitch can't stop shoving food in her fat face and doesn't want to be bitched at for it
>>
>>42122321
Is that why you deleted your post? Because you're so factually correct?
>>
>tfw aspergers skinny shy wimp not motivated enough to simply lift a bit more to get a bit bigger and get women

It hurts my arms lads ;-;
>>
>>42125866

That wasn't even a case of text obscuring tone, it was blatantly obvious. Like, you LITERALLY may have autism if you couldn't detect the sarcasm in

>Oh sorry, I didn't know that your anecdotes were more factually correct than my anecdotes
>Oh wait, they're not

Honestly get yourself checked. There isn't even really sarcasm to detect and yet you still somehow missed the sarcasm.
>>
>>42128509
>The fact that most terrorists are muslim does not mean muslims support terrorism.

I wish i was as flexible as you. Shoving your head up your ass that far must be hard.
>>
>>42127275

This was literally a /pol/ thread. The OP is nothing but whining about liberals. Slapping a FPH subject line on it doesn't make it /fit/. I didn't derail the thread, I responded very on topic to what the OP was about.
>>
>>42128628

What post? I can still see everything just fine. Some faggot mod might've deleted it though, cause I got a warning for "off topic" posting, despite commenting on exactly the same thing that the OP was about.
>>
>>42128772

Why don't you tell us what it's like? You must know since you're the one with your head up your ass.

So you think that the actions of any single person in a demographic automatically define the entire demographic? Do you know what a fallacy is?

Just to be clear, I'm not the guy you responded to, just jumping in.
>>
>it's a "libcucks get mad and cry about political posting as they post politically" episode

Post fat people stories
>>
>>42128875

This wasn't a FPH thread just because OP included a FPH subject line on his /pol/ post. But I guess once you get btfo'd the way conservacucks have in this thread, the only thing left to do is pretend that the liberals were off topic despite staying 100% on topic from the very beginning.
>>
>>42128924
shoo shoo libcuck
>>
File: tila-tequila.jpg (89KB, 828x466px) Image search: [Google]
tila-tequila.jpg
89KB, 828x466px
>>42128772
by this definition, Trump voters are literal Nazis
>>
File: fuck you.gif (203KB, 248x225px) Image search: [Google]
fuck you.gif
203KB, 248x225px
>>42128623
FUCKING-
SHIT-
THIS PISSES ME OFF-
Please tell me that you reported this. I need to know retribution has been passed on this piece of shit woman.
>>
>>42128932
WTF I LOVE TRUMP VOTERS NOW
>>
>>42121358
absolutely

obese southern white women deriding lazy blacks and sneering at thin middle eastern women while ordering 2000 cals worth of frappuccino for them and their augustus gloop-in-training before stopping at mickeyd's on the way to the trailer home where her unemployed boytoy rolls out the shag carpet

'liberals' may be preachy, but 'conservatives' are just often retarted
>>
>>42121358
>>42128963
Yes I too shitpost about my purely anecdotal and use that to judge a mass demographic as I chastise people for shitposting about their purely anecdotal evidence to judge a mass demographic and then wrap that back around to adopt a non-committal fence-sitting position to shield me from critiques fired from either side.
In fat people stories threads on /fit/.
Seriously lads take it back to r/Politics nobody gives a fuck about you.
>>
>>42128934
Would have even if I wasn't required to, annoying thing is that she'll probably just be moved to a different table and monitored more closely for like a month
>>
>>42129000
Trips of truth why the fuck have there been so many political mudflinging wars in fps lately
>>
>>42129024
some guy had a theory about it being some hamplanet derailing the treads with pol-shit.
>>
File: Screenshot_20170713-121842.png (696KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20170713-121842.png
696KB, 720x1280px
>>42120836
"Umm excuse me sweetie but we dont fatshame around here"
>>
>>42121278
But men are just stronger
>>
>>42127574
God loves, man kills.
Wow. Haven't thought of that comic in like a decade. Good job, Anon
>>
File: 1496788040882.jpg (30KB, 460x365px) Image search: [Google]
1496788040882.jpg
30KB, 460x365px
>>
File: Lazy_f07b17_5976682.jpg (46KB, 480x382px) Image search: [Google]
Lazy_f07b17_5976682.jpg
46KB, 480x382px
>>
>>42128931

>oh shit he btfo'd me
>better resort to ad hominems to avoid making myself look like an even bigger fool by responding

Thanks for confirming that I am correct.
>>
>>42129196
shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42129000

This was a "political anecdotes" thread from the very beginning. The liberals responding with their own anecdotes are only countering the OP anecdotes. The liberals aren't trying to define a demographic with anecdotes, only the OP and his supporters in this thread are guilty of that.
>>
>>42129238
>n-no it's not us

Back to r/politics now fatty
>>
>>42129203
Shoo shoo /Poltard
>>
>>42121655
Bitch couldn't even get a model who lifts to pose with her.
>>
>>42129203

shoo shoo conservacuck

Wow, that really helped the discussion didn't it? Oh wait, no it didn't. Guess I win since you've effectively evacuated yourself from any discussion.
>>
>>42129256
>/pol/tard
>telling all political discussion in FPS to stop

Libcuck crying so hard he's having a mental meltdown

>>42129260
Shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42129251

Go read the thread from beginning to end and tell me that I'm wrong.
>>
>>42129268
>Keep saying the same thing over and over

Conservatecuck crying so hard he can't help but to respond back.
>>
>>42129284
>n-no really

Back to r/Politics now fatty
>>
>>42129300
Shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42120865
>HAES is not political.

Wrong. HAES is absolutely 100% a liberal invention.
>>
>>42129268

>libcuck
>telling others to stop discussing politics in FPS after he gets btfo'd, then when they throw that shit back in his face, he claims that they're the ones who are trying to stop the political discussion

Why don't you just start posting valid points again? Oh wait, that's right, you lost the argument and having nothing valid to respond with lmao.

Conservacuck crying so hard he's having a mental breakdown. Shoo shoo conservacuck.
>>
>>42129323
>libcuck in tears

Shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42129302

Guess I'm right then. I tried to open an avenue to use evidence to discuss who was right, but you knew that would prove me right and you wrong, so you're desperately trying to be dismissive of my request instead of addressing it. Thanks for helping to prove that I'm right.
>>
>>42129196
>>42129260
>>42129323
>>42129339
>being this desperate for the last word on an anonymous forum

lmao silly libcucks he's trolling you
>>
>>42129333

>conservacuck in tears

Shoo shoo conservacuck

We can do this all day. Or, you can actually post a valid response. But you won't, because you don't have a valid response to anything. Because you lost the argument but you're too afraid too admit it and learn from it.
>>
>>42129339
>>42129356
Shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42129352

>being this desperate to avoid admitting that you are wrong

It would be so simple for you guys to either just admit that you lost the argument, or give a valid response. Silly conservacucks, learn how to properly engage in discussions.
>>
File: Dad_488bfc_6305655.jpg (47KB, 900x452px) Image search: [Google]
Dad_488bfc_6305655.jpg
47KB, 900x452px
>>
>>42129373
>this paranoid

nigga idc about your political jostling he's just responding with a set-response to anger you and it's clearly working lmao
i just come here to read shit about hamplanets
>>
>>42129366

Shoo shoo conservacuck

Any time you want to admit that you're wrong, please feel free.
>>
>>42121246

You won't find such a thing, precisely because it IS a leftist thing and leftists don't do scientifically valid polls.

Just read the news. Trump is bad, Trump is bad, Trump is bad, and then an occasional "such and such (fat) celebrity PERFECTLY shuts down body shamers on Twitter!"
>>
>>42129390
shoo shoo libcuck
>>
>>42129384

And I'm just calling him on his shit to anger him and it's clearly working.
>>
>>42129403

shoo shoo conservacuck
>>
>>42129406
>calling him on his shit
>"N-No, he's mad even though he's posting three words and I'm boasting about m-muh cherished internet victory!"
>REEE I WIN

Holy fuck you are tilted
I'm getting in on this

SHOO SHOO LIBKEK
>>
>>42129406
>>42129418
shoo shoo libcuck

>>42129419
based conservachad
>>
libcucks btfo
>>
>>42129419

I don't care about "winning" anything, I'm just repeating that because I know it triggers him.

>>42129427

shoo shoo conservacuck

I'll keep up with this until the thread gets deleted.
>>
>>42129456
>I know it triggers him.

>he is the one posting three words
>you are the one getting upset

No he's definitely triggering (You), silly libcuck
>>
>>42129456
shoo
h
o
o
libcuck

>>42129467
based conservachad
>>
>>42129467

>he is the one repeatedly spamming three words

He's definitely triggered, otherwise he would have stopped responding. Silly conservacuck.

>>42129479

shoo
h
o
o
conservacuck
>>
File: this nigga.jpg (28KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]
this nigga.jpg
28KB, 750x422px
>>42129406
>>42129456
>N-N-N-NO I'M NOT ANGRY, H-H-HE IS
>C-C-CONSERVAKEK TRIGGEEEEEEEEEEEERED HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

libcuck in literal tears
>>
>>42129492
>word-for-word repetition

libcuck def. triggered
>>
>>42129492
libcuck absolutely triggered
>>
>>42121358
RIght outside of Athens here friendo. I wish you were lying.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1499965438098.jpg (63KB, 535x690px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1499965438098.jpg
63KB, 535x690px
>>
>>42129494

>N-N-NO HE'S NOT ANGRY Y-Y-OU ARE
>L-L-LIBCUK TRIGGEEEERED HAHAHAHA

conservacuck in tears

>>42129510

conservacuck def. triggered

>>42129526

conservacuck absolutely triggered.

I love how there were only one or two conservacucks actually discussing things with me when the thread was actually composed of substantial responses, and now that it's devolved into this, there are suddenly more and more of you jumping on to engage in this prattle. I guess conservacucks really can't hold substantial conversations and their only means of communication is spewing

>l-l-l-libcuck h-h-ha t-t-t-riggered libcuck h-h-ha am I r-r-right g-g-guys h-h-ha
>>
>>42129580
Coming in on the tailend but it seems that the libcuck lost this one. Like they lost the election.

Fact is conservacucks may be fat but they admit it. Libtards are fat and say that its a genetic thing. They also say islam and gay people get along.
>>
>>42129580

Just... Give it up, man, you lost this one a LONG time ago.
>>
File: brfss_2015_obesity-600px.jpg (102KB, 877x528px) Image search: [Google]
brfss_2015_obesity-600px.jpg
102KB, 877x528px
>>42121228

https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html
>>
>>42129603

Nah, the conservacucks lost at least 100 responses ago. They evacuated the discussion after repeatedly getting btfo'd, then resorted to this prattle because they were proven wrong but didn't want to admit it.

>Fact is conservacucks may be fat but they admit it. Libtards are fat and say that its a genetic thing.

If you had actually read the thread at all, you would know that this is not true. That's literally what the entire thread was about.

See the comments listed here >>42124452 to understand why.
>>
Is it truly and honestly just calories in vs calories out to lose weight, regardless of your macros?
>>
>>42129619

I won this one a LONG time ago. I won the actual discussion, and now I'm just trying to get the last word in on this desperate war of attrition and name calling that the conservacucks started after myself and others repeatedly btfo'd them throughout the thread.

It's honestly frightening to me that people like you think these incels have "won" anything just because they're persistent name callers.
>>
>>42129682

Effectively, yes. It's not 100% exact, but it is so close to 100% exact that for all intents and purposes we say it's so. For example, if you were to use calories in vs calories out to set a weight loss goal, say a 500 calorie deficit a week for 20 weeks, then you're going to more or less lose exactly 20 pounds in that 20 week period. Assuming you were accurately tracking your calories during that period, there would maybe be a one or two pound difference based on the macro profile of the diet you ate during that period.
>>
>>42129648
Sorry dude but no.

And unfortunately this is why libtards dont win. They get stuck in their echochamber and when they lose they say "no we didnt they lost"

Also should expand about conservacucks. They may be fat but the majority of chads are red.
>>
>>42129782
Thank you anon
>>
>>42129796

Sorry dude but yes.

This is why conservatards don't win. They get stuck in their echochamger and when they lose they say "no we didn't they lost".

They lost the actual discussion that was being had earlier in the thread, then resorted to name calling. I responded to each of their name calling responses by literally copying their responses but changing the word "libtard" to "conservatard". You and the rest of them thought that you could avoid the actual discussion (which they had lost) using that war of attrition name calling tactic, but I kept up with it, and now I've won the name calling war of attrition in addition to winning the actual discussion earlier.

>Also should expand about conservacucks. They may be fat but the majority of chads are red.

Again, go actually read the thread. That is the discussion we had that I won. Here, go read through the comments listed here: >>42124452
>>
>ITT; americans calling eachother political words that have nothing to do with the subject
>and fat people
>>
>>42129887
This is what i mean. Conservacucks have been winning man. But youre stuck in your echochamber to admit it. No matter how many jokes colbert or trevor noah make the conservacucks are still getting their stuff through.
>>
>>42124925
> Shitty r-squared
> No other output
Bro at least post the p-value.
>>
>>42129909

You're still not explaining what they won or how. You just keep saying "they're winning they're winning" over and over again without saying why you think they "won". Meanwhile I actually won in the actual discussion that took place earlier in the thread. My arguments were better, and the people I was arguing with eventually gave up because of it. If those don't count as wins, what does?

I don't know what the fuck you're on about with colbert or noah and conservacucks "getting their stuff through". Again, have you actually read the thread at all?
>>
>>42130042
Yes and just because you kept posting doesnt mean you won. It was literally
>libtard flipped
>conservacucks laughed
>libtard tried to save face
>conservacucks laughed more

If you dont see that the echochamber is real and hardcore with you. Not a conservacuck btw just calling it like it is.
>>
>>42129626
Literally anywhere you go in the states 20% of people are obese. These are truly the end times
>>
File: 7895023798230.png (931KB, 960x608px) Image search: [Google]
7895023798230.png
931KB, 960x608px
>>42120421
fresh content
>>
>>42130068

No, it was

>conservatard flipped but pretended to laugh
>I laughed
>conservatard tried to save face and cover for their blunders earlier in the thread

Again, I made valid arguments and won the discussion earlier in the thread. They refused to either admit this or just stop responding, so resorted to namecalling. When I mimiced their namecalling, you and they declared them the winner.

Explain in detail to me how that puts me in an echochamber. I honestly don't think you know what that word means. An echochamber is when you only listen to people who agree with you and block out anyone who doesn't, i.e. you let your ideas "echo" within a "chamber" filled with like minded people.

I didn't ignore anyone who disagreed with me. Earlier in the thread, I consistently responded to the one or two people who were actually engaging in the discussion. Then once that discussion had ended, the "libtard" callers came in and started throwing out "shoo shoo libtard"s and refusing to engage in any kind of discussion on the topic we had been discussing earlier. Even in my initial responses to this namecalling, I was inviting them to present a response to the earlier discussions, but they refused, instead opting to continue the namecalling.

Because of this, I effetively won. That does not put me in an echochamber. It does, however, put them in an echochamber. Do you see why? I didn't block anyone out or refuse to engage in further substantial conversation, they did. Which means that they were in an echochamber.

I honestly don't understand why you are so set on ignoring all of this and claiming that I "lost" and that I'm in an echochamber when they are the only ones demonstrating echochamber behavior. Again, please actually go and read through the whole thread.
>>
>>42121351
She says she's proud but sjes using the fridge to hide her belly and her profile pick males her look skinnier tham she is.
>>
>>42129000
i mean, you're right, but the general sentiment is loathing towards both sides in which the common denom is just that they're fat and vocal opponents or proponents of an agenda

but in my case, i encounter more right wingers than left, so i tend to associate the annoyingly obese and ignorant with that demographic...i guess the only positive is politicization of the epidemic? as in actual agenda might be pressed forward as part of campaign promises besides 'everyone needs healthcare!!' but preventative measures eg eating fucking less and better

/diary
>>
>>42130372
Wow no one can be this triggered.
>>
>>42130350
Looks like whales are in their right place.
>>
>>42130471

Not an argument. I love how people who lose in the actual discussion always have to resort to namecalling, attacking the tone, and dismissively calling people "triggered".
>>
>>42130488
Not the guy you were talking to. That guy was actually being pretty decent. I have no problem telling you that you are very triggered
>>
>>42130350
Imagine all of the water displaced in that hot tub. If it didn't refill and they all got out, there would be like a foot of water in there.
>>
>>42122346
No one wants to end public education devos wants the DoE gone and control of cirriculums to go back to states.

No one except the most hardcore AnCaps and religious nuts want public education to go away.
>>
>>42130518

But I'm not. You chose between the two of us who you liked more based on only a handful of comments out of the whole thread, then decided that the one of us who you like more was not triggered and the one of us who you disliked more was triggered. Continuing to respond and defend myself is not being triggered. Being triggered is when you flail around wildly and incoherently in response to someone calling you on something. I.e., calling a HAES person on their bullshit and then having them start screaming and namecalling. Please don't use buzzwords that you don't understand the meaning of.
>>
>>42130604
>but im not

Actually you are
>>
>>42121441
Does somebody have the new pic of her? She became hot or at least cute.
>>
>>42125805
dieting is not an industry. you actually save money by consuming less
>>
>>42121797
>I reckon it's all the cheese, not the dressing, cheese if horrific for calories
>>
>>42121758
lol
>>
>>42130637

>Actually you are

Actually I'm not. See, you're doing the same thing that everyone else is. I make valid points, and there's substance to my point that you could use to form an actual, substantial response. Instead, you opt to declare yourself correct. Why do so many of you do this? Why is it so incredibly difficult for all of you to just engage in a proper discussion instead of resorting to these absolutes?

See, if you've decided that you can by yourself decide who is triggered and who isn't or who is right and who is wrong, then I can do the same and by myself decide that you are triggered. Now we're both just sitting here calling each other triggered, same as how earlier me and the other guys were just sitting there calling each libtard and conservatard back and forth. It accomplishes nothing. There could've been actual discussion, but instead, everyone elected to stop responding to my valid points, probably because they coudn't come up with any counter points, and so they became embarrassed and shut down.

I called them on this, and then people like you came in and arbitrarily decided that somehow I was the one who was triggered. They were the ones who ejected themselves from a discussion that they were losing. They were triggered, I called them on it, then you decided that I was triggered because I was calling them on being triggered.

Once again, you kids really need to stop using buzzwords, especially when you have no idea what they mean.
>>
>>42130350
before they got in, there was only like 5 gallons of water in that hot tub.
>>
can we go back to hating fat people

y'all stupid niggers needed to be banned for off-topic shit like this where are my MODS
>>
>>42121461
>somehow digest a gram of Uranium
>become 8 million pounds overnight
>>
>>42131011

Problem is, the thread was off topic from the very beginning. The OP isn't fat person hate, it's /pol/ tier liberal hate. This was never a real FPH thread.
>>
File: angeree.jpg (173KB, 512x511px) Image search: [Google]
angeree.jpg
173KB, 512x511px
>>42125979
This person makes me upset
>>
>>42121304
He's clearly not a liberal you fucking moron he's rightly pointing out that so called conservative fatsos also justify it to themselves.
>>
>>42125882
>>42126203
There is no such thing as a /pol/ meetup you delusional jew.
>>
>>42123581
You realize that both people pictured are liberals?
>>
>>42132284
American liberal: wants trigger warnings and mobility scooters for all. Eat like literal pigs everyday and be shielded from the concequences.

Venezuelan liberal: wants democracy and freedom to express ideas. Also eating every now and then would be nice too.
>>
>>42128509
A part of the left supports HAES, no part of the right supports it.
Therefore it is a leftist thing, wich does not mean all leftists do.
>>
File: trebuchet_1.png (425KB, 538x404px) Image search: [Google]
trebuchet_1.png
425KB, 538x404px
>>42121563
Obvious Solution.
>>
>>42124358
Not that her tattoos arent shitty, as are most chinese charater ones.

But in China 老婆 is used almost exclusively to mean "wife" kind of like "my old lady" in english.
Thread posts: 323
Thread images: 81


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.