Want to bulk AND cut.

No OP, what you need is low rep, low weight

>>42065857
no reps, no weight

You're right on the money, op.

>>42065857
>high weight high rep
>guys what would happen if I just sprint 10k?
You'd fail halfway through or it wouldn't actually be high weight.

File: 1496286048954.jpg (18KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x480px

>>42065857
>My question is: what will do both at once? High weight, high rep?
You found the secret formula OP, how can decades of research have missed this?

>>42065857
If only it was that simple.

File: mfw less than 4 scoops.jpg (31KB, 552x618px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 552x618px

>>42065857
High weight, high rep

If you can get high reps it's not high weight for you

Glorious bait my friend

What would happen if you max everything out until exhaustion? Over training? Just constantly lower the weight and keep going for max reps.

What if I do my 1RM, solely 1x1 with two 5 rep warm up sets, for every workout every time I go to the gym and then increase weight by 2.5lbs every third session?

>>42065857
>My question is: what will do both at once? High weight, high rep?
My question is: What do you want to achieve? Culking or butting? The weights-to-reps-ratio heavily depends on your intention. Richson Blahiana has some good shit on that. Just google.