Running shoes

Brooks are a really good brand.

>>41984474
Thanks, I'll look into them.

New Balance fan here. If you're in the US, check out Joe's New Balance Outlet. They often have steals on great shoes.

>>41984571
Oh, nice! Thanks for the tip.

>>41984602
Certainly

>>41984442
Can't claim to have used saucony, so your judgement is as good as mine on that. But asics and Brooks are great for distance training. They hold up well over long miles, and have a fit for every kind of foot. Plus you can get an older model for cheap, and they're just as good as a $120 "new model". New balance and mizuno have also come a long way recently, they're not too shabby. Nike is hit or miss for their running shoes, only their super expensive ones are good and it's not worth it in my mind. Never liked adidas running shoes (apart from spikes). Have no experience with sketchers.

>>41984442
saucony are good. brooks are generally a good shoe. asics are alright, and a bit cheaper.

go to a running store and get your shit checked out. it's not a meme, everyone runs different.

File: PSX_20170630_203404.jpg (3MB, 4032x3036px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3036px

>>41984442
I swear by my flyknit racers for race day, shaved 4 mins off my 10k. For training I use adizdro Adios boost and asics kayano 22

>>41985367
I just don't buy that flyknits will actually last more than a couple of races. They're made out of mesh and peeps for Christ sake

Just run barefoot you giant wuss

mizeno wave rider 19

best shoe i've ever ran in

>>41985367
wow this is gay as fuck
even for /fit/

>>41985959
enjoy your hookworms

>>41985635
My last pair did over 400 miles. Not bad really. Only use them for race day and speed work on the track

>>41986065
Not gay enough I'd say