are delts like that achievable for a natty man?

Cheekie is looking good.

File: file-956354FC-5968-46A4-B9EE-16970515D021-26632-000011B1A15B5426.jpg (116KB, 799x1200px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 799x1200px

>>41935200
no.

>tfw you'll never be as aesthetic as /fit/'s wifu

>>41935200
If you have George Hackenschmidt's delt genetics, sure. Otherwise, no.

File: SideChest.jpg (7KB, 198x300px)

7KB, 198x300px

>>41935302
even he doesn't have delts like her. kek
the power of steroids

File: 86bbffdddf3c799f0ae416d3dcf05068b916d88d_s2_n2.jpg (368KB, 1280x1280px)

368KB, 1280x1280px

>>41935401
kek

>>41935619
Shoop

>>41935619
wtf she's HUGE

>>41935206
Cheekie is an ectomorphic femlet who can only dream of looking that swole.

>>41937318
I hope Cheekie goes hardcore and pumps herself full of test dbol and buckets of var. I want to see her get swole

Ive trained my rear delts direclty for 2 years now (natty) and it still looks like shit (see >>41935277 ).

So Im gonna go with no. Sadly big rear delts is only achievable with roids.

>>41937874
ment tot refer to >>41935401

>>41935619
looks natty to me.

>>41935619
Mirin.

>>41935619
>tfw your delts will never look that good

>>41935619
dang

>>>>41935200
She's probably 4'3" and her delts are the size of my fist, but she's tiny and lean so they look huge on her.

Also, I have fucking boulder shoulders without having to do much work on them. My legs are absolute shit even though I do twice as many sets and thrice as much weight but my shoulders are glorious while only doing a few sets of side laterals here and there.

>genetics are a hell of a drug

>>41942406
Are you me? Literally calflet and no legs

>>41935200
Yes.
>>41935401
>comparing a black and white photo to that full color in the gym with a pump shot
Not to mention his delts are probably the size of her skull.