How bad is this for 6 months of lifting?

Holy shit is that acne

>>41896374
Seeing the picture scrolling through the catalog scared the shit out of me because it looked exactly like my back.

How tall are you?

>>41896380
It's freckles and scarring from sunburn and a car accident

Damn bro get on a low dose of accutane. I had acne like that and it was awful, tortuous.

>>41896387
I'm 6'6

>>41896374
Well with nothing to compare too, I'd say

>>41896401
Looks pretty good for that height.
I'm 6'4 so I'm kind of jealous my back took longer to get to that point.
Work on traps though

File: 1491361484051.jpg (23KB, 617x617px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 617x617px

for 6'6 thats really good for 6 mo.. what are your lifts? Also, being a fellow lanklet at 6'3, please take my advice and do a lot of weighted pullups and lat pull downs. Us /tallbros/ have to work extra hard to get wide so dont fall into the problem i did and neglect back work. Loogin bretty good tho

i'd say you look pretty normal for six months. you could probably look better if you did everything optimally, but you definitely look like you've been lifting for a few months.

if you don't already, start doing chins. add weight when you're adequetly strong

>>41896467
Bench 215
Squat 285
Dead 395
OHP- I only use dimbells, but I've gone up to 70lbs

File: IMG_6482.jpg (101KB, 722x1280px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 722x1280px

>>41896404
Here's my back when I started. I didn't take enough pictures back then ig, not the same pose but you get the general idea
>inb4 bacne