Husbando? Or diet-pronto?

File: lardsuckler.png (455KB, 680x491px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 680x491px

These pics are a few months old, but same weight really (215-220) -- probably was more active in gym.

>>41819508
Post cock bby

>>41819447
>using "aesthetic" as an adjective
Kill yourself, faggot.

File: Farnese.png (1MB, 567x847px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 567x847px

left is more appealing imo. you have better definition and look fitter. you still look decent on the right, but you could look better. i think 2x a week is too little. you could def cut a bit of weight. like you could look decent if you were say at 200lbs.
\at the end of the day, that's my take. do what makes you feel the most comfortable in your skin. but people will tend to prefer left since it's more defined.

left looks 10x better

>I think right looks way more aesthetic.

You're wrong, and you have two days worth of evidence to show you are wrong.

Stop seeking validation for your choice to get fat, you won't find it. It's as bad as (almost the exact same thing) as the fat acceptance movement.

>>41819447
Idk about your body dude but you should get those violently invasive moles checked out.

Might as well be comparing apples to oranges at this point. The lighting and angles are totally different, first picture overexaggerates your v-taper, thus making the picture more appealing.

I like second more but that's because I'm a complete faggot for Justin.

>>41819447
you're not a husbando you're fat you piece of shit mixed with crap

>>41819447
Right is better. But I'm gay so keep that in mind. Maybe a slight cut. But right>>>left IMO.

>>41819984
i think that's crap on the mirror

lose 20lbs and you will look good, you just look like a strong-ish fatty

File: 1497134566776s.jpg (8KB, 250x140px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x140px

>>41820018
also first you have to get a gf to be "husbando mode"

>>41819447
left: scrawny manlet who might be okay at pull ups and bench press
right: pudgy manlet who would be a little better than the scrawny manlet at bench press but worse at pull ups

>>41819447
What was your program on the left?
Looks way sexier.

>>41819447
Lol what a manlet

>>41819928
Is it possible to stay at a large weight / frame and get definition? I'm not looking for quick solutions; just something to work towards.

I see people that are big and cut. Do they just drop carbs or what?

>>41820153
I am no expert but I would browse the meals that rich piana sells on his website, lots of asparagus and shit

>>41820153
>>41820153
yeah, but i think you pushed it a bit too far. you'd still look pretty thicc if you cut down a bit. drop 15lbs and you'll look 10x better while remaining big. and 185lbs is not skinny by any metric (unless you're really really tall)
also the people who are really big and cut usually maintain that physique for a brief period of time, so it's not a sustainable goal.

>>41820296
I'm 6'3 (so 6'5) -- my crush literally called me lanky (lanklet) and made fun of my waist. (She's skinny)

Did I just get pranked?

You look fine in both picture so stop worrying, some women will like more right and some left so just go what you like the most.

>>41820375
>someone made a cute joke so I have to get fat

Did you grow up in a doll's house? Why are you so sensitive?

I think right is a lot better. I like guys that exude pure masculinity though. Looks stronger. Some girls would prefer left though. I guess so its a toss up of what you like more/type of person you wanna attract. If your goal is husbando mode stay at right bodyfat and keep lifting

>>41820375
You are literally me.
I'm also 6'3, went from slightly more muscular and dry on your left pic to bit more bf% than your right pic.
Still look very much the same though. Are your lifts also nearing 2/3/4/5 ?

>>41819447
Left looks better by a long shot.