BMI

>>41812609
BMI is a statistical measure to look at population and correlations. It is not a measure which says "if ur bmi is x thats bad and if its y thats gud" except by retards who don't understand how these things work.

As a statistical measure it is very good, as most people are not abnormally muscular or atrophied.

File: Goals.jpg (7KB, 308x164px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 308x164px

>>41812609
If youve ever taken anything fitness/health related in school you'd know BMI should be never used to dictate someones fitness, its too general and doesnt take in any variables such as muscle mass

also mcgregor probably trains in ways that are specific for his sport, making him a better athlete in his sport, not to look better

jason statham does look incredible tho

>>41812655
This. Simply put, BMI is pointless for just the individual.

File: Quebec GOAT.png (113KB, 390x270px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 390x270px

McNigger is at least an inch shorter than Statham.

File: GOAT tier.jpg (38KB, 397x542px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 397x542px

Here's more like Statham height

5'10 according to internet, so maybe really 5'9 barefoot

>>41812609
>statham ->looks since he is an actor
>gregor performance ->since he is an mma fighter

also >>41812655

>>41812687
BMI is perfectly fine for people besides athletes. Well, even athletes. Just not specifically people who lift. No one else besides us cares about putting on muscle mass to the absolute extreme. BMI literally only doesn't apply to people who lift and is generally fine for anyone else.