Remember back when /fit/ insisted that Aaron Curtis was natty?

>>41794260
thats pretty fucking retarted

>>41794260
everyone is natty, 6'3+, 8" dick here

lel I was too back in 10', but coincidentally I had only started back then and was full of hopes to achieve a simplyshredded (TM) physique by myself

>>41794423
So what did you do when the natty reality hit?

A) quit lifting
B) get on steroids
C) stay natty and focus more so on health rather than getting jacked

>>41794452
C
and focusing on strength more too

natty limit is nowhere near aaron curtis but rather hollywood captain america / thor physique when you have a pump and soft without it, which is still pretty good and big imo. Stopped gaining much after 3 years of good lifting

He is natty you moron.
I've been in this game 8 years now and he is one of the rare real natties.
The dude is full autism about diet, he never breaks consistency. I've had him on facebook for years.

His progress was made over what is now a 15 year period, he has pictures to back it all up, and its linear. Nowhere is there a 'jump' that suggests steroids.

Btw, he doesnt look like your OP pic very often. That is peak condition almost, which he has only reached a few times in his career, with as I mentioned earlier, autism level diet and training.

>>41794573
>natty
>linear gains

lol, you have the same time lifting as me and sound like a deluded retard

>>41794260
Why do you only ever see this level of serratus development in roided guys? Is that one of those muscles that react particularly strongly to substance use, like delts, traps etc.?

>>41794573
Bait as fuck.

Nattys make 90% of their gains in the first 2 years

>>41794562
>but rather hollywood captain america / thor physique when you have a pump and soft without it
yeah, keep dreaming bitch, people claim that zac efron is on roids for baywatch, now imagine guys that are at least 45lbs heavier than him