Would this work?

>>41746337
More or less, but you'd still need at least a brief period of clean bulking prior to the deficit to have muscle to fall back on. Since you're it going for ottormode the bulk cycle wouldn't have to be long.

>>41746337
no, you will actively lose all of your muscles and 6 inches of height if you do this routine

ffs, of course lifting weights will work. is it the best routine? no. Is it the worst? no.

File: teen_swimmer_by_builtbytallsteve-d5k724l.jpg (145KB, 716x1115px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 716x1115px

>>41746337
Skip the shrugs. the whole point of ottermode is to have no traps and godlike shoulders

>>41746462
reminder that this is shooped

File: klokov.jpg (570KB, 788x697px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 788x697px

>>41746337
No this is garbage.
Also why the hell do you want ottermode and look like a wuss?

>>41746482
only the delts,everything else is legit

>>41746524
Went otter-mode because my girlfriend at the time said she preferred me that way, then we broke up and I got twice as much pussy than when I was bear-mode before we were together.

>-800 caloric deficit
Why? -500 is just fine already

>>41746337
I wouldn't recommend it