What's more important: strength or volume?

Both, jesus fucking christ how hard is it for you turbo morons to understand this?

>>41560732
You mean "intensity," instead of strength. Volume and intensity both build strength.

Ideally you'd have a heavy day and a light (volume) day.

Volume in aesthetic proportions

enough with the silly questions go eat something

>>41560732
ya fuckin obviously u dont do situps fatty

depends on your goals. But why not both?
I do my compounds on 5 reps and accessories at 12 reps

>>41560732
>Strength of volume
This is not an either or situation. You need to incorporate high intensity days along with very high volume days.

Both important but one becomes more so depending on what youre training for

>>41560732
I don't get the pic. He looks great and I bet isn't weak either.

File: KYsThKfJRzBpOwkfWKO1BXAYrI5XxRJZPlzy3n6HvTM.jpg (21KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 320x180px

you fuckers better start being intense

File: IMG_1084.jpg (134KB, 469x700px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 469x700px

I don't understand the question

Increase your strength within bodybuilding parameters, which are volumous relative to non-hypertrophic programs.

>>41562546
Hahahaha love the picture. Loved and hated that game

>>41562432
And the picture is agreeing with you