What's the most amount of eats you should eat in a day?

36

File: 18nrkfgsd76mwjpg.jpg (33KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 800x450px

>>41348476
>36
do you even eats? at least 50

5 dozen

as much as you want , dietary cholesterol is officially a non issue .

>>41348562
https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/chapter-1/a-closer-look-inside-healthy-eating-patterns/
>As recommended by the IOM,[24] individuals should eat as little dietary cholesterol as possible while consuming a healthy eating pattern.

>>41348598
And why should we ? It has been proven that it has no impact on serum cholesterol , and that serum cholesterol in itself is a sign that your body is trying to fix your fucked up arteries .

>>41348678
>It has been proven that it has no impact on serum cholesterol
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739004

>and that serum cholesterol in itself is a sign that your body is trying to fix your fucked up arteries
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144%20

>>41348839
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27739004
>It must be emphasized that dietary cholesterol is only one of several dietary factors influencing serum cholesterol levels.

Second study supports your idea of it leading to health complications. But I have to critique on the point that it doesn't tell us whether these people are involved in any fitness program or sport. For all we know, it could be just regular people that think walking to work is a exercise.

>>41348937
>>It must be emphasized that dietary cholesterol is only one of several dietary factors influencing serum cholesterol levels.
>To achieve substantial serum cholesterol lowering, favorable changes in all of these factors must be combined. To maximize cardiovascular risk reduction, a lifetime of a healthy diet is needed.

>Second study supports your idea of it leading to health complications. But I have to critique on the point that it doesn't tell us whether these people are involved in any fitness program or sport. For all we know, it could be just regular people that think walking to work is a exercise.
How would that change anything? Smoking, high blood pressure, high blood glucose, being overweight, etc become OK as long as you're involved in a fitness program and/or sport?

>>41348473
I'd say the recommended is about 4.
Go for some organic eggs my dude, all those hormone infested eggs gon give u some gyno desu
Also, you can do with egg whites for some extra protons in a shake, good protein source.
I usually have 2-4 everyday.

>>41349039
Thats the critique dumb fuck. We don't know anything about these people who were tested. If you took all smokers who exercise vs non smokers who exercise, do you really believe results would be the same or significantly different? You are literally trying to take one factor and generalize it.

>>41349321
What critique? Projection and lack of reading comprehension are not a critique. Smoking is an independent risk factor for disease. The negative health effects of smoking do not magically disappear if you exercise, a fantasy which amounts to nothing more than childish wishful thinking. Nobody ever said that smoking is the sole cause of all disease, just that it should be minimized in a healthy lifestyle. Same goes for LDL and other kinds of atherogenic lipoproteins. You are a walking straw man.

>>41350241
Furthermore, it's pretty easy to compute and examine the relative contribution of each factor in different populations;

http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/65/1/43
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv630
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa053935
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/102/13/1511
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/109/9/1101
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/162/8/764/122427
http://cpr.sagepub.com/content/3/3/271
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/133/1/74

There's an inverted-U shaped relationship with exercise, and even at the minima (41 MET-h/week) risk remains

http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/67/3/316

Meanwhile in the absence of atherogenic concentrations of lipoproteins atherosclerosis can't happen, no matter if there's smoking and inactivity because they are the causal prerequisite

circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/16/1832

>>41348473
36 and 2 multivitamins

File: rude.jpg (17KB, 326x262px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 326x262px

>>41348598
>>41348839
>trusting links ending in .gov

>>41348839
Your first link contain no full study , it's just fluff .

Your second link prove my point .

Smart boy

>>41348473
eat all day every day my dude

>>41351254
>Your first link contain no full study , it's just fluff .
I apologize for overestimating your intellectual capacities. The publisher is on the spam filter. Click the full text link on the side or try

https://link.springer
.com/article/
10.10
07%2Fs
11883-016
-0615-0

after removing the line breaks.

>Your second link prove my point .
Unsurprisingly your deductive skills are just as impaired as your reading skills. Subendothelial retention of cholesterol driven by hypercholesterolemia is what fucks up arteries and what the body tries (and fails) to fix. Your point has the direction of causality wrong.