why do manlets generally have better bodies?

>>41334043

>tecate girl sniggering at Junior's concave body

Because lanklets are unnatural, evolution did not mean for us to be this tall, the black monsters should mate with the monstrous tall "females", to create the perfect slave race for us normal sized humans (normal sized is under 5'7, historically, the rest are simply easy targets).

Maybe you shouldn't be looking at people who are several inches apart but the same weight

But Canelo has weird abs like Mayweather. They look terrible.

>>41334043

they dont because their bodies are the size/weight of 12-14yr old boys.
Narrow shoulders, small hands and heads are also epidemic among manlets.

>>41334043
Is a set amount of muscle going to look more or less when stretched over a larger or small frame?

Think for fucks sake.

>>41334686
hahaha yeah big heads are what everyone wants

>>41334686
Both those guys are over 180 lbs

>>41334043
Its the porportions. Taller guys have em longer limbs and longer torsos, though their shoulders are generally not porportionally as wide as the manlets. The same muscle mass is streched out over a wider canvas.

That said, nice thread for the 50th time. Mods are such fags, why the fuck do these manlet threads not get taken down???
God fucking damnit.

it doesn't matter, women will take a skinny anorexic manmore over a built manlet any DAY OF THE WEEK. because the manmore will let her feel safe, doesn't matter if he knows how to fight and is strong at all.

why not just end it manlets?

>>41334187
>The state of manlets

>>41334043
shorter people generally exhibit greater symmetry. Also, the amount of muscle an individual can build, both per unit time and maximally, doesn't scale linearly with height. Natty manlet physiques will thus generally look better in an aesthetic sense. Women strongly prefer height to a marginally more aesthetic physique tho.

t. 6'1" guy who sees that there are comparative advantages along the manlet-lanklet spectrum.