Fat logic

>>41297292
Here is an interesting video that talks about it https://youtu.be/HGunZpKLb5o

>>41297316
you have to go back

>>41297292
Ask him why he's fat.

>>41297292
am I the only one that wishes that shoop was real?

>>41297316
Damn! I lived in NYC for a summer without a kitchen and ate those sandwiches all the time. Guess that's part of why I lost 5 lbs in 3 months at "1300" calories a day.

>>41297292
Simply tell him that while our bodies are not incerators, the numerical value assigned in the lab does have bearing on how many calories will actually be consumed in the body and through trial and error we have arrived at various numbers compatible with maintaining, losing, or gain weight for the average person.

>>41297292
I think it's really funny that I can't even tell which pics of her are shooped and which aren't. Is this one? If it is, it's a great job. Can't even tell.

>>41297292
>How do we actually measure the calories in food ?

If only this thing exactly like Google existed so you could just google the questions you have hmm, what a great world that would be

>>41297834
The name of the mental convincing (not gymnastics because muh mental knees), "fat logic", is ironic. It's not logical at all. It's all rationalizing to avoid the truth (actively or passively).

Trying to reason with someone who isn't ready to be reasonable... you'd have an easier time doing Sysiphus' fate

>>41297292
It's still an oxidative reaction. It's a little different in that we do it slower but it's pretty much the same. We use carbohydrates to fuel oxidative reactions that help us to produce atp and a few other molecules.

>>41297747
is it a shop? what's the original?

>>41297292
Just say ok and don't reply. You won't get anything out of arguing with him. No reason to prove anything