>6-pack abs is a social beauty construct
There is literally no evolutionary purpose to find starving people attractive
Tumbler is that way -------------->
>>41216716
hes actually right
there is no evolutionary purpose to build up muscle just for looks
build them for strenght and performance you faggots
>>41216707
Except that most NCAA athletes have bf% low enough for a six pack.
>>41216738
You only have to look strong to get laid, not be strong
>>41216738
>there is no evolutionary purpose to build up muscle just for looks
Except attracting a mate for the purposes of reproduction?
Both arguments are bullshit anyway, much like 99% of evolutionary psychology """facts""" people like to spout.
Work for a six-pack if you think you'd enjoy having one for whatever reason.
>>41216738
t. fatty
Anyway, you fucking retard. Looking good IS an evolutionary advantage in the very widest sense possible.
An evolutionary advantage is something that provides an advantage in mating and reproducing.
If you think looking good doesn't fall into that category then you're a silly billy.
>>41216738
Sexual selection nigga.
>>41216769
>>41216764
>they're to stupid to charm a fucking female (NO DICK) with their talk to get laid
>>41216707
Social connotations mean that if a woman has a man with a 6-pack it's a status symbol.
Tell me... Have you ever been in a storm? ...A storm of fists
>>41216806
actually having abs and big belly is way better than having no fat
invalid arugment
>>41216784
>(NO DICK)
Not interested cause I'm not a faggot.
>>41216707
>ywn have a 10-pack
just kms