Knew something was fishy here. Did the analysis and his arms

god damn, vg has some big fucking arms

>>41128736
not gonna lie, he's huge for his bodyweight (whole 120lbs of it)

How thw fuck do you get 19 inches arms on that BW.

I do weighted chin ups(2plate) for like 4 reps, heavy tbat cheat rows(4 plate), doing curls and othet back rxercisrs and my arms arent huge.

Is the trick doing heavy weight low rep curls(thats what I know he does)
But then again everyone says weight isnt thst imoortant for curls unliken reps.

>>41128846
Work your triceps.

>>41128736
what does the picture show?
>>41128846
it more about building both large triceps and biceps

>>41128846
it's genetics

i know that's a lame answer, but it's the truth

you could always try curling 3x a week with some good volume, biceps can be worked often, but I feel disingenuous giving you this advice because my arms got big just curling 1-2x a week with 2 sets each time

this vegan green bean doesn't have 19" arms. arnold had 19" biceps at prime

>>41128846
you answered yourself - you're not isolating and are core dominant
I'm the same, tho I don't care about arms size that much, only strength. I can curl 1 pl8 strict with 14" biceps.
But if I wanted to grow it I would isolate it with low weights hig reps

>>41129197
Assuming he's 6'2, they look 16". But OP's picture doesnt' really show anything.

>>41128846
i'm 5'8 around 170 and have almost 15" flexed but then again i have a high peak bicep (can fit roughly two fingers between forearm and bicep when flexing) and i never do any curls apart from weighted chinups. my lifts are better than that guy though so i doubt he has 19" arms

>>41129197
Arnold in his prime was 19.5" cold and 22" pumped.
>>41129275
>>41128908
VG has 18.5" arms cold. Watch the video.

>>41129307
His arms are 19" though, it's in the video.

>>41131488
18.5 cold, most likely 19 pumped

>>41129275

Arnold is 6'2 also.

Nah its legit, hes 6'3" with big arms. That Said, hes not thicc in other departments as he doesnt (or dient) train compound intensively

>>41131141
>Arnold in his prime was 19.5" cold and 22" pumped.
There is a lot of debate about that.

>>41131488

Ye, impressive that Arnold had the same measurements in his prime although his biceps look a lot bigger. I dunno why that is then.

>>41131506
Arnold was never 6'2", He was a 6'0.5" in Prime, 5'11" now

>>41128736
Nigger what the fuck did you just shoop together?

>>41128736
>Fake tape

go back to /pol/

>>41131528
What? That they were bigger or smaller?

File: hqdefault.jpg (21KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x360px

Seems reasonable, he is 6'3''.

>>41131506
He's not and never was 6'2. He was 5'10" AT BEST.

>>41131528
No, he's basically been outed as never being 22inches.
He had 20.5 inch arms cold.

Hell I had 18.5 inch arms at 6'3.
...but I was 290-300 pounds at the time

File: 20170417_002046.jpg (437KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 960x1280px

>>41128736
Nah i think they´re real. That looks a lot bigger than my fatcep at this picture at 17½"
>>41128846
bicep size is mostly genetic at natty level muscle mass. i´ve had over 16 inchers since being 14 or 15 yrs old. Only did a few summers of whitewater kayaking before those times but no lifting. It all depends on the size of the peak and tricep size.

>>41128736
Too bad he's a wristlet.
Heh.

>>41128736
Do you know how circumference works?

>>41128736
It's almost like his arm exists in 3 dimensions, and that there's a difference between circumference and diameter...

(6"*3.14 = 18.8")

>>41131533
because this dude wears fucking lanky ass shirts that dont fit him aswell as having the most unaesthatic sitting pose in his video.

also he's 6foot3 so 19 inches are like manlet 16 inches.