Is this natty?

>>40719798
dunno but Im nutting rn

>>40719798
Could be

100% roids

>>40719798
Is believe him if he claimed natty. That physique is possible with a heap of work.

>>40719798
Probably not
large upper traps is good indicator whether he is on roids or not

I look better and I'm partially natty so yea

>>40722489
>partially natty

what did he meme by this ?

>>40722499
Did steroids but stopped.

>>40722520
I see, good for you for having the willpower to get back to natty after steroids.

>>40722520
Did you keep your gainz?

>>40722520
>>40722535

That wasn't me you cuckboi

Actually am pretty sure he is.Hasn't he been lifting for almost a decade?

>>40722482
What larger upper traps are you talking about?Are we looking at the same picture?

>>40722622
didn't say he has large upper traps faggot

>>40722691
But you did...

>>40722700
That anon didn't. Read again. He said "probably not"

He was implying that since that person didn't have very large upper traps, he could very well be natty

the stupidity of non-lifters on this board pains me, of fucking course he is natty

>>40722520
>do roids
>take a picture one day after stopping the cycles
>half natty here guys ;)

>>40722609
what makes you think natty results would increase over time? the fug m8

natty results in terms of aesthetic maxes out after less than 2 years, after that only option is fat fuck and strong mode or dyel

>>40723752
in the OP it reads
>Is this natty?

>>40722482
quotes him and responds with
>Probably not
do you even context buddy?

>>40719798

Lifetime physique I don't see why not. I'm sure if you saw him in natural daylight, not pumped and without flattering angles you wouldn't question it for a second.

I look like I use steroids watching myself in the gym mirror after a workout and when I get back home I'm DYEL.

>>40723775
>natty results in terms of aesthetic maxes out after less than 2 years

holy shit either u have no idea how to train or u are 1st year 'red pilled' lifter.

im stuttering when trying to find words.. like how fucking stupid can u be? u really think a 2 year lifter training for 'aestethics' looks the same as 10 year lifter who also has been training for 'aestethics' the whole time?

jesus christ what the fuck how can anyone fall into this meme?

>>40722482
>>40722622
I second this, guy has fuck all traps. Shoulders are a lot better but disproportionate.

>>40719798
what >>40723813 said
keep in mind that this picture probably was the best one he took; best angle, best lightning, flexed

pictures like that are always an illusion of the 'best possible'

>tl;dr: Yes this can definitely be natty.

>>40723823
Boy are you in for a rough ride if you stay natty for 10 years.


Enjoy wasting a large part of your youth for no results.

>>40723823
Holy Beautiful

File: 1477793674280.jpg (91KB, 400x402px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 400x402px

>>40722482
Not true

>>40722482

i have more prominent traps than him even though I never train traps

i'm not saying I look better than him, he definitely has a much bigger chest etc.

I think huge balloon rounded delts are the easier and more accurate way to determine non-natty status, no traps

File: 084.png (102KB, 300x256px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 300x256px

>>40723752
>Is this natty?
>Probably not

>He never said he wasn't natty

>>40719798
looks about 5'6 so yeh probably..

Also anyone who doesn't think this is achievable natty anyway, even at 6' is deluded.