How can she look so fat if she only weights 64 kg?
Women above 55 are fat unless they're very tall or lift.
>>40614642
oh boi that's t h i c c
post moar of this plump little qt, OP
>>40614652
Hmm I don't know about that though
>>40614655
Standarts maybe different in America or some European countries because so many girls are fat. Still 55+ is too much
>>40614642
Short and pear shaped with no tits/muscle
MOAR
>>40614642
>How is she fat
She's 140+ pounds. What do you mean how can she look fat? She is fat.
>>40614685
Is 140 pound too much then?
>>40614685
At 5'5" even. If you're over 110 lbs as a normie who doesn't lift and taller than 5'5" you're fat.
>>40614690
At 5'5"? Absolutely yes.
>>40614642
64kg is fat as fuck for a woman, yo.
>>40614642
because fat weighs more than muscle. since she weighs so much and takes up so much space - she is a couch potato with no muscle and her body comp is comprised of all fat (obviously she has just the bear minimum skeletal muscle to function but that's it)
>>40614775
fuck I meant fat weighs less than muscle but takes up more space... i gotta get some sleep
Body composition is a weird one, I guess. I'm the exact opposite, I weigh a lot but my size and measurements don't reflect that. I think I would rather weigh less and have a flabbier body but that's just me being an idiot and focusing on weight.
>>40614760
That's bullshit.
>>40614642
>tfw i'm both taller and lighter than this fat bitch and i'm still kinda chubby
>>40614652
65.5kg
>>40615033
>>unless they're very tall or lift
>>40615052
I am 5 ft tall and don't lift
>>40615075
I don't believe you
Ha!
>>40614950
Whatever you say, fatty.
She's quite unfit and has minor postural dysfunction. Good for looking fatter than you actually are
>>40614785
you could just say that muscles are more dense
perhaps youre too dense for that
>>40615033
You're fat.
>>40615075
If you also weigh 64kg den u fat
I'm a male with a height of 5'7" and a weight of 130 without muscles. Is that fat?
>>40614642
Am I really the only one here who doesn't think this looks all that fat?
When I think of someone who's "fat" I'm not imagining a normal-looking woman who is carrying somewhat more around her midline than she should be.
>>40615521
You aren't the only one, I'm with you.
>>40615521
she's a bit chubby
i reserve fat for really fat people
>>40614642
>only 64kg
Never dated a girl above 52kg. She's fat
Is she fat?
>>40614642
>only
At that height she should weight like 5-10 kg less
>>40615607
Yes, kinda close to unfuckable
>>40614642
High bodyfat and zero muscle. Going by bodyfat instead of BMI, she ia probably obese. 64 kg is not even low for her weight.
>>40614642
She is a 168cm woman and weighs almost as much as me, 175cm male.
She claims she is fit. Is she?
>>40614642
Any women 170cm and below should maximally weigh 55kg
>>40614642
This male is the same weight but 7 cm taller and actually has some muscle unlike her.
She looks fat because she has loads of fat.
>>40615928
to be fair, she could be fit and have a high bf%
which doesn't seem to be the case considering how the fat falls down
>>40615928
No she's fat.
>>40614642
No muscle let's the skin be loose so the blobby fat just hangs anywhere
>>40615607
Yes, she's disgusting
>>40615936
>>40615637
>>40615556
>>40615312
>>40615303
>>40615084
>>40615033
Funny how when I post without stats I get comments like 'routine' and 'goal body' but when I post with, I'm suddenly fat. Either you people say I'm lying about my weight because I look too slim to have such a high BMI or I've photoshopped my pics or you just resort to calling me fat because nothing else explains it.
How about you realise making blanket statements about how much women should weigh is stupid.
>>40617174
>How about you realise making blanket statements about how much women should weigh is stupid.
Salty fatass
>>40617174
good for you that you're more muscular and carry the fat well. you belong to like 5% of the female population. an average chick like in the OP looks pretty bad at that weight. other women are more unfortunate and look worse than the OP chick
>>40615033
hey
wanna go on a boat ride?
:)
>>40615521
That's because she's got odd fat distribution.
Arms and chest is thin, but she's got a double chin and clear fat around the waist.
>>40615607
Yeah, that's fat.
>>40617275
It's not about luck or fortune, it's about having some muscle mass. Which is something you can control.
>>40614642
64kg is quite a bit for 168cm...
>>40615928
Even if she were fit (which I highly doubt based on her bf%) she's still a superficial cunt, the tats are a huge red flag. Also
>having that bf%
>still no tits
It's like some kind of a cruel joke.
>>40615607
Obviously.
>>40615928
Is there anything more worse than fat chick with no tits?
>>40618905
A fat dude with them ?
>see what I did there ?
>>40614672
My ex was short (160cm) and weighed around 55kg when we first met, I know that's not skinny but she definitely gained weight during the year our relationship lasted, she never looked fat to me because she had good body fat distribution and a nice ass but she barely worked out (short walks, gym once a week), by the time we broke up she was maybe around 62kg. In her defense, she did have a fucked up knee and flat feet, such a shame she was hungry all the time.
I miss her :(
>>40618942
pic not related?
>>40615928
she's chubby but I'd love to bust some nuts in her
>>40614760
Only if they don't lift/do any sport and are short. Lots of gym qts weight 60/65/moaaaar
>>40620986
>Lots of gym qts weight 60/65/moaaaar
Only if they're tall or on gear.
>>40620705
Nigger, she's obese.
>>40615607
T H I C C
H
I
C
C