Low rep high intensity / high reps low intensity

(C) Doing both every week.

>>40562464
>high reps low intensity
Best right thar.

>>40562495

t.manlet pushing 20kg

>>40562464
depends on what you are trying to achieve, just do one of both every week, also depends on your routine.

>>40562518

I want to put on defined muscle. So which?

>>40562533
high volume all day erryday. strength is for fat powerlifters and autists

File: powerlifter vs bodybuilder.png (1MB, 1542x816px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1542x816px

>>40562512

>>40562464
Low rep for strength

High for size.

If you're intermediate, do PHUL to get both.

I did my thesis and I did research for my doctorate on this

>low weight high reps allow for higher volume and cause gene expressions that allow for hypertrophy to occur
>long term progress is slower than...

>high intensity (80% 1rm) low volume which adds strength gains faster than the low intensity group, which after a long period if volume was higher in the first group, the heavy group will surpass the volume load (assuming reps x sets stay the same) within 6 months.

If volume load is the same in any group, the hypertrophy will be the same.

the same gene expression for muscular hypertrophy occurs to a lesser degree with less volume, and higher with more

I close with this:

why not just be strong AND look strong rather than look strong?

Both

Why the fuck would you ever not do both

>he doesn't do both

File: trapsforants.jpg (7KB, 224x224px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 224x224px

Both, my friend. You gotta do that concurrant training, it's gonna be a beautiful thing, I swear to you.

*sips lemonade*

>>40562464

>low rep high intensity on compound lifts
>high rep low intensity on isolation movements

And this isn't up for a debate. You do it like this and get the best of both worlds.