just answer this question

Basically you need to calculate how many bags of chips you're gonna eat on dat dur bulk

>>40499485
Yes you have it right

>>40499500
But then I read online you should only ingest 1.6-2 g of protein per kg of bodyweight,meaning i need 130g.
Twice less than this shit.

What would happen if I just hit 3k calories and 130g of protein?
I'd just turn into a fatass?

File: 1487254361716.jpg (36KB, 640x586px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x586px

bumping my shit thread

>>40499485
Get get enough protein for your weight. Max of 1.6g/kg because the body doesn't process excess protein and your kidneys will go through hell breaking it all down.

>>40499621
Thought so.
Thanks bro

File: Rep-Ranges.png (42KB, 1008x1008px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1008x1008px

>>40499660
You got it bro, if you eat twice the protein you need (which half of this board does) it damages your kidneys due to the fact that ammonia is a by-product of protein break down.
And here's some science before some gomad guy comes in here.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02640414.2011.619204
>1.3–1.8 g/kg per day consumed as 3–4 isonitrogenous meals will maximize muscle protein synthesis
>experienced athletes would require less
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24027183
>protein intake of 1.2-1.8 g /kg per day can be extended to the warfighter
http://www.nutritionjrnl.com/article/S0899-9007(04)00099-1/abstract
>in top sport athletes where the maximal requirement is ∼1.6 gPRO/kg/d
https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/protein
>0.84 g/kg for adult men (average faggot)
>The more protein we eat each day, in excess of our needs, the more work our kidneys must do to get rid of the ammonia
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/what-should-you-eat/protein/
>minimum of 0.8 grams of protein for every kilogram of body weight per day (or 8 grams of protein for every 20 pounds of body weight)
Also you should read the last one, it's got good stuff about red meat and cardiovascular disease.

And here's a random fit infograph

>>40499691
I'll read them all,as I'm interested in biochemistry and medicine.
The best post I've seen on /fit/ in a while,can't thank you enough

>>40499691
Interesting. But why does the /fit/ sticky claim you're supposed to take substantially more then? I thought at least that was somewhat legit.

File: TrapsandDelts.jpg (110KB, 635x900px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 635x900px

>>40499941
Same reason NASA crashed an orbiter, americans can't convert metric to imperial and it's easier math when you use pounds.

>>40499585
you are overthinking it