Is this the new natty king of /fit/?

DYEL

>>40302299
Do you even know what DYEL stands for?

>>40302222
The sideways belly button and wide hips kill it in this shot but if watch the movie and you see him move he's actually pretty jacked

>>40302405
Pic?

File: jacked.jpg (53KB, 330x590px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 330x590px

>>40302431

>>40302222
While this physique is definitely attainable natty, he is not natty in this pic. IIRC he was down to like 120 pounds for a movie role and had to get from that to this physique in two months, and he definitely cycled for it.

Also, nice digits.

File: 1457217115359.png (383KB, 454x479px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 454x479px

>>40302222
CHUCKED

>>40302222
Impressive digits

Can i make it there in 1 year? 6ft 185 very blubbery

>>40302677
Most likely. Depends on how blubbery and your dedication

>>40302677
It'll take at least 3 years minimum I'd think. I've been lifting for four and I look NOTHING like him