Genuine noob here: So i've been told that if i do the exercise

>>40202097
You can damage yourself from any exercise if you're that big of a pussy.

>>40202109
Why isn't /fit/ friendly?

File: IMG_3655.jpg (12KB, 233x218px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 233x218px

>>40202097
I never liked the way this made my back feel. Then again, back when I tried it I had a laughably weak core. Might have to give it a shot again.

i do it and i had bulging disc and now i don't even feel my lower back, as opposed to when i didn't lift at all

>>40202097
You dont want the spine segments to move during loaded lifts. As this cause shear force, wear and tear.and there is pretty much no benefit to hyperextend your back during movements vs keeping your spine neutral throughout the movement.

File: e.png (31KB, 703x475px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 703x475px

>>40202097
The angle represented in the pic is not the "full angle", it's just hyperextension, which does no good to your muscle development.
Instead of going straight - up like that, go down - straight instead
>pic related

>>40202128
Because you're a moronic buffoon.

>>40202280
Ok, thanks for the tip

>>40202293
Dont mind me im just coming in with another opinion to confuse you further.

I do them between the OP image and the other image, like this:

http://www.catalystathletics.com/exercise/425/Back-Extension-Hyperextension/

>>40202128
Go post a stupid question on any other board and see how anons reply.

>>40202097
The ROM in your pic is fine OP as long as you load into your glutes/hammies.

>>40202280
The more limited range Anon posted is really good for targeting your erectors and lower back.

So do both?

File: 1485780191592.jpg (43KB, 718x481px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 718x481px

>>40202097
Welcome to /fit/!