SARMs vs AAS etc

Im just a bit worried about sarms since we REALLY dont know the long term effects of their usage. youre pretty much a guinea pig.

File: 910f0ad0511d42409b4cfb29e725937d.jpg (68KB, 720x524px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 720x524px

>>40159597
I can see where you're coming from, as they are pretty new. I just see AAS as having too many negatives such as shutdown, going bald, nuts shrinking, and stress on the liver. SARMs, from what has been reported, have none of those side effects. I know when cardarine (also not technically a SARM) was administered at high doses it was carcinogenic but those doses were very high and tested on lab rats. Do you have any experience with AAS? It is very hard to come by good discussion about this topic.

very little to no unbiased information out there about any of these substances. 99% of what you find online is companies or people related to these companies shilling

>>40159737

Right, there are many of those and it took me a long time to find a reputable source. There is a good subreddit about SARMs and source-talk. People post their monthly bloods, precycle bloods and post cycle bloods and other than suppression everything is fine. Clomid and Nolva are sometimes use for PCT but others contend you don't even need a PCT since LH isn't hardly impacted. Really, the only places you can find good info are unsponsored forums such as the subreddit and here on /fit

>>40159583
Post some pictures if you are making great progress.
If you don't than there is your answer why fit hates sarms.

>>40160303
Pretty much this.
>Inb4 op makes an excuse to why he doesnt have progress picture

Who am I kidding, op isnt even going to reply

Bumping one more time for ops great progress picture.