Nonceps

>>40156105
Chin up and curls/hammer curls. Slow on the way up, and slow on the way down.

>>40156105

Maybe try some compounds like weighted pull ups and heavy ass rows bitch nigga

>>40156105
Triceps get worked out more for almost everything they're more useful than biceps that's why they're growing more.

Biceps are just for dyel curlbro nyrers

>>40156118
The problem is the frontal view of my arms. 183cm 82kg male with %12 body fat and my arm is 40 cm but in frontal it looks like 25 cm :'D

>>40156133
Hard to picture without a picture. But my shit is pretty small too. I focus more on the longhead and overall tricep to make the frontal look more wide.

>>40156133
You can't really see your biceps on the front.
Your triceps give your arms a wide look

I'm the opposite, my biceps grow well but my triceps are barely noticable after dips, french press and pushdowns have been added to my routine

>>40156105
GO S L O W

>>40156125
Real world stuff, aka carrying shit and stuff like that, is hard as fuck on your bis

>>40156105
you have shit genetics for biceps

sorry, it's not what anyone wants to hear, but you lost the genetic lottery on this one

hit them with more volume anyway, but if you're having this much difficulty getting big biceps don't expect miracles

>>40156105
Some anon recommended heavy concentration curls and weighted chin-ups and for me they worked wonders

>>40156105
stop being a curlbro it doesn't work

File: pajeettttt.jpg (41KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 400x400px

>>40156105

you're lifting too heavy you fucking pajeet, you must have the worst form and muscle activation I've yet to see in a human being.

seth feroce is 5'5 230lbs of pure muscle and he's just BARELY lifting heavier than you for arms.

>b-b--bbut he'\s on steroids ablooblolboboo

>>40156722
Let me say that I'm a wrestler not saying I'm strong af but I can do some shit. My problem is with the proportions, other parts of my body are fine.

>>40156118
>>40156124
>>40156186
>>40156255
>>40156429
I am going to try very slow concentrated curls and chinups next time, thanks for the responses guys.

>>40156740

how is that relevant to anything?

lift lighter weights and isolate your muscles better, do the movement slower, do higher volume how is that difficult to comprehend

>>40156790
What advice did you give to me and now you are asking "how is that difficult to comprehend?"

>>40156833

>you're lifting too heavy

since that was too difficult to understand I had to make an entire paragraph to explain it.

Work them 3-4 x per week for 3-4 sets. Mix rep ranges and different exercises

>>40156722
Huh? Am I missing something? What makes you think OP's Indian?

>>40156909

noodle arms, lifting shit too heavy for them with garbage for is an indian staple.

>>40156771
dude i'm sorry to tell you that but you only have two options:
>first option
hit biceps one more time in the week and try doing a little lower but always with perfect form, abuse dropsets and never drop the weight, always make sure to go down slowly
> second option
roid and focus on your biceps

>>40156105
>>40156118
>>40156124
>>40156125
>>40156133
>>40156149
>>40156167
>>40156186
>>40156168
>>40156204
DO BICEPS RESPOND BEST TO VOLUME OR HEAVY WEIGHT?????? pls

>>40157686
DO FUCKING BOTH
FIRST HEAVY, THEN VOLUME.
SAME DAY

DO PREACHERS, DO BARBELL CURLS, DO CONCETRATION CURLS, DO SEATED DUMBBEL CURLS WITH YOUR ARMS SLIGHTLY OUTWARD, DO HAMMER CURLS
REAP GAINS

>>40157686

Depends. Do you want them stronger or just bigger. Are you natty or not.

>>40159038
Bigger, yes.

>>40156105
Steroid.