narcissistic health freaks

>>40127019

M&Ms are actually filled with cane sugar which is 50/50 glucose and fructose where as blueberries are 100% fructose so the M&Ms are better for you.

File: kill yourself .png (13KB, 655x217px)

13KB, 655x217px

>3 calories each on average

File: 863.gif (1MB, 204x195px)

1MB, 204x195px

>>40127039
I'm at a loss for words

>>40127039
LOL

Nigga 100g blueberries is like 50cal and has fiber/vitamins/antioxidants

100g m&ms has nuttin

File: bokay.jpg (31KB, 316x340px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 316x340px

>>40127039
>blueberries are 100% fructose

We really need a thread to compare blueberries and M&Ms?

New Years resolutions man.

>>40127179
>>40127162
>>40127129

Fructose just goes to your liver and spikes your insulin, glucose goes to your muscles and actually gives you immediate energy, more glucose makes it the healthier choice.

>>40127197
>fiber and phytonutrients have no role in the digestion and absorption of macros,
>phytonutrients play no role in cellular functions and don't help you recover from oxidative stress
>dairy isn't inflammatory in the human body

wew

>>40127245

>phytonutrients

easy on the buzzwords there friend

>>40127263
>fiber isn't a phytonutrient

Dog, you're dumb >>40127263

>>40127312

Your* lmao so much irony in one post, but it's pretty standard for idiots who don't even have a proper grasp of the english language to go around calling other people dumb.

>>40127263
The fuck do you want me to call them?
You plebs think "vitamins" and "antioxidants" are limited to the 5 fucking cofactors/coenzymes they put on nutrition labels.

I'm tired of you retards thinking a shitty diet can be fixed with vitamins or foods that are fortified are good for you.
If I called them anything else you dumb fucks would write it off as "Just take vitamins, bro"

Fuck you for not knowing anything about nutrition.

>>40127326
>shitposting on a fitness forum
Kys

>>40127335

You literally never need to go beyond macro/micro nutrients

>>40127353
That's because they're not mutually exclusive

>>40127353
what's the difference between calling it a phytonutrient or micronutrient?

How is one more buzzword-y than the other?

>>40127374

"micronurtient" is a common place word used in everyday conversation, "phytonutrient" is a buzzword used by faggots over analyzing things in an attempt to sound more knowledgeable (usually to win an internet argument)

>>40127391
No.

>>40127391
Fiber and enzymes aren't memes you fucking fat sack of shit

wow this is interesting. better off with the chocolates.