thoughts?

>shoes on the beach
why tho

>>39881582
the rock vastly over reports his height hes no taller than 6' 2" on a good day

>>39881588
rocks and shit

>>39882770
>rock worried about other rocks
Okay!

>>39881588
When I was 6 I had a piece of glass wedge under my toenail and rip it off.

But I'm not a little bitch and still go bare foot.

>what is fucking perspective?

The Rock is standing much farther back

t. Art major

>>39882830
t. faggot

>>39881582
>Which one isnt telling the truth?

The carney that worked at a carnival where everyone lies about height.

>>39882777
besides shoreline rocks that can be jagged and sharp, popular beaches are strewn with litter including broken glass bottles. Also if he's playing the lifeguard role; he may be forced to run on slippery surfaces; boats, piers, etc
its unconventional but may serve a situational purpose

The rock is standing a couple inches behind that other guy.
Let's say those thin shoes add 0.5''
He is still more than half a head taller, the average human male head is about 9''. For the Rock it's probably more.
Maybe a 6'' difference in height.
Most people say that the rock is surely not 6'5'' like he claims, but closer to 6'2''.
The other guy is probably no taller than 5'9''/175cm, but almost certainly not shorter than 5'8''/172.5cm.

>>39882830
I was going to disagree but now I'm stuck because depending on how I look at it, the Rock is both in the back or in front

damn efron looking joocy

>>39883283
probably caz he joox

>>39881582
Nobody would ever lie about being 5'8", so i'll say the Rock is lying.

>>39882895
Everyone knows Zac is around 5'8"

>>39881582

rock seems kinda tubby there

>>39881582
neither, both clearly aren't natty

>>39881582
None, the rock is 6'5 and zach is 5'8. Thats the REAL diference in most REAL LIFE scenaries. Everybody here have body dismorphia, are insecure faggots or are trolling. Thats the truth. You can tell anybody that you are 6'5 when you are 5'10, and only the 10% of the people will notice that you are lying.

/thread.

>>39883610
This

>>39883610
6'5 is very tall man. Eric Wareheim is about 6'5 and it's extremely easy to tell.

>>39883761
>>39883610
>samefagging this hard

>>39883529
Well, then my math checks out:
The Rock is 6'2'' (lol he has been lying by 3'' and many people believed him.)
The other guy is 5'8'' like he claims.

File: 1304938223524[1].jpg (47KB, 369x368px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 369x368px

>>39883610
This remaind me something that happened to me last year:
>Being 5'9
>tinder slut ask about my height
>"I-I am 6'2"
>We meet n fuck
>A couple of days after that: "Are you sure that you are only 6'5? You seems taller"

People in general have no fucking clue about the numers.

>>39883774
I think that he exagerates it to make a point but >>39883610 is kinda true

WWE exaggerates heights but he just goes with that reported one to avoid confusion.

>>39883955
If she mistook a 175cm guy for someone that is over 196cm, then she is a borderline retard.

Bu on a less exagerated scale this happens all the time, women are shit at spatial reasoning - scientific fact. Most guys can get away with selling their 5.5-6'' dick as 7-8'' inchers and get away with it, that's one of the reasons that women laugh at someone who is honest and says they're 6'' - that like only half of the 7'' (actually 5.5'') their last boyfriend packed.

File: bushroot_by_posteclypsis-d3lp2qp.jpg (108KB, 900x1273px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 900x1273px

>>39881582

Efron's hair...

>>39881759

Typical for a wrestler.

Undertaker isn't 6'8", or fucking 6'10" or anything candyland like that. He's more like 6'6"barefoot - maybe less these days.

Brock Lesnar is like 6'1".

These guys height fraud worse than 5'11".

>>39883774

This 6'5" is towering. The rock isn't 6'5", no way. He's certainly over 6ft, 6'2' is easily believable. 6'5" is happystats

>>39883610

Throwing insults means you don't have logic to stand on. 6'5" is VERY fucking tall. Sure there are men well built over 7ft, but they are profoundly rare. 6'5" towers over 99% of people.

When I was in the Military, the TALLEST guy in our company was 6'5', and that was out over around 150 men.

I know because I measured him. Everyone thought he was like 6'8", but I had a busted knee and was put in charge of taking heights and weight for that Annual Physical Fitness Testin APFT, and found that most of the guys were all exaggerated, except the tallest who played college Basketball, who knew he was 6'5". It's a lot taller than people think because a lot of the guys who claim it aren't really that tall.

>>39884057
6'2 is 188 cm, not 196. The diference between 5'9 and 6'2 is only 13 cm, like the distance from the base of your thumb to the top of your index finger. The general diference its only 7%. For most people, if they are not paying attention there is no diference like >>39883610 said. But yeah, agree that girls are stupid.

File: RockBrock.jpg (80KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1280x720px

John Cena's official height is 6'1'', the Rock's official height is 6'5''

>>39884184
>6'2 is 188 cm, not 196.

>Being 5'9
>A couple of days after that: "Are you sure that you are only 6'5? You seems taller"
Reading comprehension, mate.

>>39884184
I certainly wouldn't call a 7% or 13cm difference minor, even if you're not paying too much attention that's very noticeable, but then again, women are kind of bad at those things.

>>39884212

Well so what? The Rock is clearly visibly taller than Cena

all these manlet threads
>arguing about inches
you manlets will never fucking learn

File: ffff.png (23KB, 412x589px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 412x589px

there is this website to compare heights
so yeah, rock is no more than 6'3

>>39884273
Link?

>>39884289
Ok found it myself lol http://www.mrinitialman.com/OddsEnds/Sizes/compsizes.xhtml

>>39882830
you can see their shadows nearly touching, so not that far away

t. anon

File: The Rock Charles Barkley Shaquille ONeal Mark Walberg.jpg (87KB, 800x740px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 800x740px

>>39881582
The Rock isn't 6'5. Charles Barkley is 6'6 and Marky Mark is 5'8. The Rock is closer to 6'2.

>>39884236
Are you retarded? Ya he's taller but it's not a 4 inch difference. The whole point is the Rock is lying about his height

>>39884215
I said that I was 6'2 and she thought that I was taller, and said 6'5 just to say a number.

File: fit was right .jpg (137KB, 572x877px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 572x877px

>>39884273
damn

File: 717.jpg (28KB, 324x291px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 324x291px

>>39884844

>>39884393
> said 6'5 just to say a number.
Well, that number was some kind of guess on her part that she probably thought reasonable. She is a massive idiot when it comes to spatial awareness. The point is that when I said 196cm I was refeering to the 6'5'' figure - which is 195.58cm.

>>39881582
they're both lying about being natty

>>39884322
wrong faggot. from left to right:

>6'2
>5'10
>6'0
>6'5

>>39884322
Damn that nigger is a fucking giant

>>39885240
What do you mean? What is Efron taking?

>>39882895
>Zac Efron certainly not shorter than 5'8

I would say the reverse, no way in hell he's OVER 5'8.

>>39883610
That's stupid. You had a point and then you ruined it by throwing completely absurd numbers around. At 5'10 you can get away with telling people SHORTER THAN YOU that you're 6 feet. Someone really short would probably believe me if I said I was 6'1 or even 6'2 as well. On the other hand anyone your own height or taller will obviously know you're lying if you claim more than an inch too much, granted they know their own height.

The bigger the difference between two people the more they can lie to each other about their heights.

>>39884844
>not 5'11

>>39885503
What isn't Efron taking?

>he hasn't heard

File: l04he.jpg (27KB, 399x385px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 399x385px

Holy kek this thread

File: Pixlr_20170104090617984.jpg (1MB, 1152x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1152x2048px

The photo is taken at a deceptive angle. When you fix the photo to its true perspective you can tell the rock is much taller than zac efron.

File: 1417674686834.jpg (44KB, 426x426px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 426x426px

>>39888198

>>39881582
>there are people that think Zac isn't on roids

Holy shit, guys juicy as the fucking rock for petes sack.

File: 1ed5e224-5a3e-45b4-834c-467b0bc0f7de.png (916KB, 800x1280px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 800x1280px

>>39888198
Posting the truth

>>39881582
lmao that resistance band

does he walk around on set with it so he can stay pumped the entire time?

>>39882830
if anything, according to the shadows, the Rock is closer

>>39882830
t. unemployed

>>39885503
>What is Efron taking?
Your oneitis's virginity

>>39885422
Shaq is 7'1

>>39888198
>>39890093
Thank god for the experts

File: 1452838270123.jpg (13KB, 499x492px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 499x492px

>>39884844
Even as a 5'9 manlet, this type of shit is always funny.

Efron looks like he works out

File: CIyw6IkWIAAk3R3.png (466KB, 731x609px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 731x609px

>>39888198

File: 1466908416625.jpg (7KB, 267x323px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 267x323px

>>39882830
>needing an art major to use common sense

>>39881588
he probably has gross ass feet