There is legitimately no reason not to be taking sarms >Less

>>39810863

>all the benefits but none of the risks of roids xDDDDD

Based on extensive studies......oh wait

Rather go with the well understood drugs and plan accordingly rather than risk taking literal research chems.

>>39810909
have you ever even tried them senpai

File: 1482854085361.png (456KB, 611x640px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 611x640px

>half the benefits of roids
>double the cost of roids
>triple as hard to find

ok why dont you just straight up tell us you're a little bitch and are scared of needles.

pussy

>>39810863
Test isn't bad for you if taken responsibly unless you're at risk for certain things, like hyperaggression and heart disease. Like Pro-hormones, SERMS and SARMS are only legal because the FDA hasn't banned them yet.

>>39811109
He literally just gave you a reason not to take them on blind faith and your response is to ask if he's even tried them? I'm not joking around here I'm serious, are you actually retarded?

>>39810863

go away dr huge, everyone knows sarms/prohormones have shit benefits and lots of side effects and cost a lot more than steroids.

fucking retard.

>>39810863
They're shit compared to steroids and peptides

>>39811145
have YOU tried them

Still not legal

>>39812300
There are lots of drugs I have never tried, so what makes you think you're going to convince a bunch of non-athletes to take obscure illegal performance enhancing drugs because you wrote three lines of greentext about how they're better than steroids?

If, in a solution, LGD is 10mg x 30mL (from IRC), and the recommended dosage is 10mg of LGD, is one dropper 10mg for 30 servings or do I need a separate dropper to correctly dose 10mg?

>Can buy SARMS online easy as fuck
>Pct requirements all impossible to get

Seriously, how does anyone get clomid?