Anybody use this stuff? How much fat did you lose?

>>39740210
No I've never used it because of the study indicating a high rate of cancer growth.

I understand the flaws in this study, but still there are safer substances for fat loss.

>>39740236
That's only if you take it for 100 weeks at like 1000x the normal dosage. And what would you say is better and safer for fat loss? DNP?

>>39740260
not him but ECA and albuterol work better.

I've used cardarine as a PED for endurance exercise and I don't think there was a major change in body composition. The cancer study is still worth being concerned about, and I wouldn't do it again.

>>39740295
Albuterol will give you a heart attack

Meanwhile cardarine reduces your risk for heart attacks, diabetes, cholesterol and even reduces cancer

>>39740334
Merck pharma stopped studying it for a reason. If they had devloped a drug that improved cholesterol, inoroved insukin response and prevented fat gain, that would be a gold mine. Every fat fuck ever would be on it.

Their ceasing development on it speaks VOLUMES.

It is not worth the cancer risk.

Just use DNP. No risk of cancer whatsoever with it. Cardarine could make you the best marathon runner in your state but the cancer acceleration is too risky.

>>39740604
No risk in DNP aside from cateracts, heart damage, CNS and PNS damage, lesions, cancer, death, etc. No risk though you're all good.

>>39740626
>cataracts
Women only
>death
They were doomed anyway.

The rest have no evidence suporting. I've used DNP and show no signs of any kind of crippling ailment you mentioned. Keep fear mongering though.

Cardarine doesn't have any sides idiots