Another cancerous height thread - /fit/ - Fitness

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
Another cancerous height thread 2016-12-17 04:00:45 Post No. 39717274
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1399167651960.jpg (40KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

Another cancerous height thread Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:00:45 Post No. 39717274 [Report]

I understand it's *much* more than height, but being 5'11 truly is an interesting feeling.

A feeling to know by /fit/ and pretty much everyone's standards, you are RIGHT at the edge of being optimum height; you're pretty much 6 foot.

Yet likewise you are familiar with the feeling of being a 'manlet' as most of you define it.

For myself and my strange mindset, it generates a sensation of humbleness? Maybe?

Intertwined with the feeling of being physically tall(er), yet concurringly familiarized with the feeling of being small(er).

As you arise, your spine exists at it's most prime; you're roughly an inch or some taller, but in the latter, you're just 5'11.

Truly an interesting height.

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:04:46 Post No.39717295
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:04:46 Post No.39717295 [Report]

File: There-is-nothing-impossible-to-him-who-will-try-Alexander-the-Great.jpg (90KB, 843x1100px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 843x1100px

>>39717274
Nothing wrong with being a manlet or a dicklet

Just look at pooinloos about dick size, they can satisfy a woman with a 4 inch dick

And also look at the """manlets""" that beat the shit of a lanket as well and vice versa
What's the thing that have in common: being /fit/ as fuck

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:16 Post No.39717315
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:16 Post No.39717315 [Report]

McGregor can beat everyone here up. Mayweather could too.

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:33 Post No.39717318
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:33 Post No.39717318 [Report]

>are RIGHT at the edge of being optimum height;
You're 5'11 not 6'1
Most attractive girls are 5'9. They're taller than you in heels and feel the same size as you

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:57 Post No.39717322
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:08:57 Post No.39717322 [Report]

>>39717295
Thanks for this. Just sometimes I get myself stuck with that way of thinking and I tend to forget what truly matters.

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:10:28 Post No.39717333
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:10:28 Post No.39717333 [Report]

>>39717318
Yes yes, but being at this height is basically close enough to say you're there. No not 6'1 but 6 flat which is honestly quite minuscule in comparison

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:10:57 Post No.39717338
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:10:57 Post No.39717338 [Report]

File: IMG_0508.jpg (30KB, 282x522px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 282x522px

>>39717315
McGregor can't do fooking noothin

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:11:26 Post No.39717340
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-12-17 04:11:26 Post No.39717340 [Report]

>>39717318
>Most attractive girls are 5'9.
Nah, what about short stacks

Also there are some cute girls that are way under that height, maybe Katya is around 5'3 as well
>Captcha: Mountains
Become greater than a mountain, /fit/!