How reliable does InBody measure bf% and muscle mass?

>>39657392
not reliable at all. Water tank > caliper > tape measure.

>>39657426
How far off? I used a bodpod and the numbers weren't crazy off.

>>39657392

they're shit senpai. i wouldn't even pay $10 for a reading

>>39657464

Too far off. Let's put it this way: I'm around 12% bodyfat. One such machine measured me as 6.9%

get a DEXA scan instead

File: Snapchat-8385286177962004382.jpg (838KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

838KB, 1440x2560px

is it useful for progress if not raw stats? i was pretty excited about the month i just had

>>39657464
It said I was at 10% BF when I had clearly visible love handles and no abs

File: Snapchat-6011805346076008560.jpg (754KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 1440x2560px

>>39657918
and today

>>39657918
>>39657923
I really want to believe mine's accurate. It had my muscle mass about 10-20% higher than the average for my age and height

>>39657392
It's not THAT innacurate however, bioelectrical impedance, isn't that accurate either. It's a good estimate and can help you track your progress if you take the measurements at the same time on the same circumstances every time (which might prove complicated). I did the same but with a different machine (actually a home one) and with calipers, both gave me the same result so, yeah.

>>39657392
It's a joke, worse than a meme, that's how bad it is.

>hydrostatic weighing
>DXA scan
>skin calipers, administered by an experienced medical professional
Those are the only accurate methods.