What's more impressive /fit:
1/2/3/4 plates or 1/1.5/2/2.5 x BW?
depends on your weight
60 / 70
100 / 105
140 / 140
180 / 175
>>39217532
BW is a shitty measurement because strength does not scale linearly with increased bodyweight
but for the vast majority of cases 2.5 BW deadlift is a fuckload more impressive than 4pl8, unless you're a turbomanlet and 2.5bw is 315 for you or something
>>39217532
>1/1.5/2/2.5 x BW < 1/2/3/4 plates
>male
pick one
this is not even up for debate btw, not even the tiniest manlet should ever weigh 135 or less
Overhead pressing your own weight is a true test of strength in most cases and far beyond most people.
>>39218278
Allometric scaling is best
>>39217532
Fuck, marry, kill
Well I have achieved the BW metrics you listed, at 85kg bw.
That was FAR harder than 1/2/3/4, obviously.
>>39217532
The body weight, unless you're a turbo manlet are far far more difficult to achieve.
>>39217532
BW is always more impressive. 60kg OHP is piss easy, but if you do it at 60kg BW you are stronk af, and it just gets heavier from there.
>>39220888
If you weight 60kg, nothing you do is impressive.
>>39220992
>i weigh over 100kg and think my 4pl8 deadlift is impressive
>>39220992
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UZBM1wgfRA
>>39220992
lanky on suicide watch
>>39218530
>135 or less
S-shut up, I'm trying!
>>39218278
2.5xBW is 405 for me :(
>>39221041
>fat is automatically strong
Lel
Fat is just fat, it has nothing to do with your muscles.
>>39217532
>1/2/3/4 plates or 1/1.5/2/2.5 x BW?
neither of those things are impressive
>Best judge of strength
pic
>>39221849
>tfw F
>>39217532
The latter. A bodyweight OHP and a double bodyweight squat are very respectable.
>>39218278
>tfw 5'7" and 2.5 bw is 350