Would you bulk on these? Why or why not?

In terms of calories, protein content, and price, the McDouble is the greatest food in the history of man

File: Dr._Bunsen_Honeydew.jpg (20KB, 303x276px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 303x276px

>>38791010
1. denatured protein.... "beef" cooked to death
2. nasty HFCS buns.... fish bait at best
3. sodium out the roof... ketchup / pickles / mustard all enhanced
4. "cheese"...... nuff said

>GOMAD

>>38791010
Some times i do, some times i dont. I get pain in my chest if i eat it alot tho so im not sure how healthy it is

>>38791029
>dried beans
ftfy

>>38791029
lowkey this.

It isn't quality for long-term health. But short-term bulking, it is god-tier for poor people (me)

File: is_this_bait.png (26KB, 527x409px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 527x409px

>>38791055
>denatured protein

Shit's full of carcinogens enjoy your cancer later in life.

>>38791010

I can't...they're not sold in my country ;_;

File: louiesim.jpg (18KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x225px

>>38791090
I would much rather do Taco Bell Taco Supremes 12-pack.... the only questionable item is the "beef"..... buttloads of calories in the sour cream, the cheese, and the corn shells... otherwise real tomatoes and lettuce.

>TB ain't what it was 30 years ago ; but who is ?

File: 1447827979227.png (782KB, 490x1015px) Image search: [Google]

782KB, 490x1015px

>>38791055
>he thinks sodium is actually bad for you

top momscience my man :^)
when will this fucking meme die

>>38791010
>390 calories

If they were satisfying I'd eat them, but in order to feel full I have to have like three of them. I don't want to eat half my daily calories in one meal with no drink.

It's so much easier to cut by eating chicken thighs and rice and vegetables. Fills you the fuck up and you have room for a small snack here and there without going over.

As far as a bulk goes? I'd totally bulk on this shit. Seriously, get 5 of these and a fry and you're north of 2200 calories. You'll gain weight like a savage if you eat that on the regular.

>>38791010
>these
oh, Sir you mean the toxic not immediately deadly weapon of mass killing and health deterioration?
Because, I dont like to be subject to self-selection for extinction.
also:
die you anti-human marketing scum!